Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

indicated speed at such a low altitude. It is stated that the aircraft would have to have about six
times its actual power in order to have reached the stated speed at that level.
7. Hurricane Erin was heading directly for New York and was very close, and yet the weather
service on TV did not mention it. Now why would that have been and who would have the
authority to block that reporting? And, why would they do that?
We can see very clearly that the official story is definitely wrong and that the people carrying out
the attack are able to tell the mainstream news services what to say, and prepare reports on the
event before it happened, and give the script to Jane Standley of the British Broadcasting
Corporation to read to the public in the full knowledge that the report was fake. These people
were also able to suppress the broadcasting of Hurricane Erin details, presumably to raise the
awareness of the attack on the Twin Towers. How unlikely is it that those people were a few
Muslims? How likely is it that those people were Americans?
Before getting side-tracked by the fine details of the attack, let us draw some conclusions from
the broad stroke information which is clear to everyone. Firstly, the official report is so clearly
wrong that it implies that the people producing the report (not necessarily those compiling the
report but those people telling them to compile the report) are actually involved in the attack, or at
best, their bosses are. Secondly, a main objective would appear to be to unjustifiably slander
Muslims in general and make Americans consider all Muslims to be “enemies” – a ridiculous
attack to foster a ridiculous notion.
That of course, does not make any mention of persuading Americans to give up some of their
rights and freedoms under the silly notion of “fighting terrorism” when in fact it is the people
looking for those restrictions who are the terrorists. Nor does it make mention of it being an
excuse to give tax money to whoever they want under the guise of “fighting terrorism”. Nor does
it make mention of the pre-planned streams of refugees entering countries with the intention of
diluting existing national cultures in preparation for one homogeneous world government.
Anyway, what did actually occur during the nine-eleven attack? There was little or no building
material crashing to the ground because the building materials were converted to small particles
which blew away on the wind, leaving only two or three inches (50 mm to 75 mm) depth of dust in
the immediate area. So, what weapon could do that? Clearly, not a conventional weapon.
Definitely not burning aircraft fuel. It has to be a “black project” development, probably a
longitudinal beam weapon.
It should be noted that the buildings were demolished from the top down. With a disintegration
weapon, you would expect the first material to be demolished will be that nearest to the weapon.
While it would not be impossible for the effect to be the result of two or more roughly horizontal
beams intersecting and the operators just choosing to start at the top, it seems likely to me that it
was just one weapon located above the building. A stealth plane or satellite positioned high
above the building could well be the weapon platform. Now, who would have access to such a
platform? One thing which has not been mentioned is the distinct possibility that this was a
weapons test as much as anything else.
Should Americans hate Muslims because of this attack? Not a chance !! Get real !!
Patrick Kelly
http://www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/
15 - 75