09.02.2018 Views

Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

eBook 3000 pages! author: Patrick J. Kelly "This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion. Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. " THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO. ​

eBook 3000 pages!
author: Patrick J. Kelly

"This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion.

Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. "

THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Just by lengthening the tube, there is a major increase in the movement of the liquid away from the axle. The<br />

increased tube length has no noticeable effect on the rising side of the wheel.<br />

Most people think of the wheel as being small with a few small tubes attached <strong>to</strong> it. If actual power extraction is<br />

the objective, then the wheel becomes a cylinder and the “tubes” extend all the way across the cylinder. I would<br />

suggest that the cylinder diameter is made about one meter and the cylinder length about half a metre if you are<br />

going <strong>to</strong> carry it through a doorway, and much longer if not. In this arrangement, the “tubes” become shallow, flat<br />

containers, making the arrangement something like this:<br />

If the liquid containers are made of, say, 3 mm MDF, then I would suggest that the sides are made using MDF of 6<br />

mm thickness <strong>to</strong> make the container rigid as the weight of liquid will be quite high. The inside of the container is<br />

sealed if the construction material is not waterproof, then a coating of varnish, paint or one of the waterproofing<br />

sprays will prevent water absorption. The liquid is added before the <strong>to</strong>p of the container is glued in place. Exactly<br />

the same amount of liquid should be poured in<strong>to</strong> each container before sealing and a measuring jug should be<br />

used <strong>to</strong> make sure that each half-filled container matches the weight of each of the other containers.<br />

A twelve volt DC mo<strong>to</strong>r can be used as a genera<strong>to</strong>r, driven by a belt and two pulleys, in order <strong>to</strong> get some useful<br />

electrical output from the device. Materials other than a liquid have been suggested as the heavier the material is,<br />

the more powerful the genera<strong>to</strong>r becomes. Mercury would be very good as it is very heavy, but as it is so<br />

poisonous, (not <strong>to</strong> mention expensive), it is not a realistic choice. Lead shot or steel ball bearings have been<br />

suggested but they would probably not flow across the containers well enough <strong>to</strong> be a good choice, and so a<br />

liquid is perhaps the best thing <strong>to</strong> use, water being an obvious choice.<br />

The Torque Genera<strong>to</strong>r of William F. Skinner<br />

In 1939, William Skinner of Miami in Florida, demonstrated his fifth generation genera<strong>to</strong>r powered by spinning<br />

weights. His demonstration can still be seen at http://www.britishpathe.com/video/gravity-power where he shows<br />

his design powering a twelve-foot lathe, a drill press and a power hacksaw, all simultaneously. The newsreel<br />

commenta<strong>to</strong>r states that the output power was “1200% of the input power” which is COP=12 but it is highly likely<br />

that he should have said “1200 times” rather than “1200%” because he continues <strong>to</strong> state that using the design<br />

would allow a one-horsepower (746 watts) input power <strong>to</strong> power 3,500 homes. If it were COP=12 then each of<br />

those 3,500 homes would receive less than 2.6 watts, which is clearly wrong. At the much more likely<br />

4 - 59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!