09.02.2018 Views

Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

eBook 3000 pages! author: Patrick J. Kelly "This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion. Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. " THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO. ​

eBook 3000 pages!
author: Patrick J. Kelly

"This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion.

Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. "

THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

These outmoded methods have gone on forever over the ages and been taken as gospel never <strong>to</strong> be questioned.<br />

The time has come <strong>to</strong> pass that these outmoded methods be subject <strong>to</strong> review. With new energy devices over<br />

the horizon, application of establishment testing procedures for these do not and can not give accurate results any<br />

more than they do for present day conventional devices.<br />

It is well past time that the establishment science and industry alike be taken <strong>to</strong> task on this matter, particularly in<br />

relation <strong>to</strong> electric mo<strong>to</strong>rs and transformers. Test results from universities and establishment facilities of new<br />

energy devices I have encountered are not worth the paper they are written on. Let's start with power<br />

transformers. A simple no-moving-parts device. Claims of upwards of 98% efficiency!<br />

I ask one question. Why, in the case of large power transformers, as used for the National grid systems, claiming<br />

ratings of around the order of 98% efficiency, do they have <strong>to</strong> be immersed in large tanks of special transformer<br />

cooling oil <strong>to</strong> keep the transformer at a safe operating temperature? And, in addition, the transformer tank is fitted<br />

with oil circulating fins around it's outer perimeter which, in turn, cool the hot circulating oil and, so <strong>to</strong>o, in many<br />

cases these transformers ALSO require a circulating pump? 98% efficiency? If the so-claimed transformer was<br />

indeed around the order of 98% efficiency, it certainly would not be required <strong>to</strong> be immersed in an oil tank, with it's<br />

ancillary devices, <strong>to</strong> keep it cool!<br />

Now electric mo<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

I ask the same one question. Why do mo<strong>to</strong>r manufacturers, claiming upwards of 90% efficiency, provide<br />

cooling fans in their machines with their attendant losses in order <strong>to</strong> keep the machine within a safe operating<br />

temperature? Simply because of the heat generated in the machine due <strong>to</strong> inherent inefficiency losses? What<br />

90% efficiency? If the fan/s were not provided, then the machine would surely self-destruct due <strong>to</strong> the excessive<br />

heat generated.<br />

So much for establishment teachings of efficiency ratings of electric mo<strong>to</strong>rs and power transformers. I have<br />

acquired and tested scores of AC and DC electric mo<strong>to</strong>rs over many years and failed <strong>to</strong> find a single one which<br />

conforms <strong>to</strong> the manufacturers data claims.<br />

ELECTRIC MOTOR TEMPERATURE VERSUS EFFICIENCY<br />

Having been involved in the field of electric mo<strong>to</strong>r inventions and investigating efficiency claims by manufacturers<br />

and mo<strong>to</strong>r inven<strong>to</strong>rs alike for the past 30 years, I have failed <strong>to</strong> find in any of their literature pertaining <strong>to</strong> technical<br />

specification and efficiency figures, any reference of the temperature of the said machines operating under full<br />

load conditions.<br />

One may ask - has this most important fac<strong>to</strong>r been lost sight of or is it conveniently side-stepped?<br />

The latter I suspect.<br />

You may ask - why?<br />

Would the answer <strong>to</strong> this possibly be, that <strong>to</strong> quote operating temperature of the mo<strong>to</strong>r in question might give rise<br />

<strong>to</strong> the question in itself as <strong>to</strong> the true efficiency of the machine?<br />

It is <strong>to</strong> be heeded that specified efficiency ratings will be inaccurate and deceptive if the vital fac<strong>to</strong>r of temperature<br />

of the machine running under full load is not stated. It must also be remembered that the DC resistance of the<br />

internal windings increases with temperature rise.<br />

Exercising my experience in calorimetry I have checked scores of different AC and DC mo<strong>to</strong>r efficiencies and<br />

found all of them deficient as regards accuracy - evidence which points <strong>to</strong> the fact that temperature of the<br />

machine running under full load has not been taken in<strong>to</strong> account.<br />

CONVENTIONAL ELECTRIC MOTORS<br />

Conventional electric mo<strong>to</strong>rs, whether AC or DC, in the work force are abysmally low in efficiency, including those<br />

claiming around the order of 60-90%.<br />

And here is why :-<br />

If a conventional mo<strong>to</strong>r with a claimed efficiency of, say, 70% and 10 watts output and a mo<strong>to</strong>r of beyond unity<br />

and 10 watts output are both loaded equally in an ambient temperature of 20°C, the conventional mo<strong>to</strong>r, after 20<br />

2 - 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!