09.02.2018 Views

Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

eBook 3000 pages! author: Patrick J. Kelly "This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion. Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. " THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO. ​

eBook 3000 pages!
author: Patrick J. Kelly

"This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion.

Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. "

THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Physicists argue that particle accelera<strong>to</strong>rs demonstrate the increase of mass with speed. This is not the<br />

case and the experiments actually demonstrate a very important principle which provides a better<br />

understanding of many physical phenomena. It is an established fact that a magnetic field develops around<br />

a charged body when it is given a velocity. Where did the magnetic field come from? In the particle<br />

accelera<strong>to</strong>r, as the particles accelerated, magnetic fields developed around them. As the <strong>to</strong>tal energy of the<br />

system remains constant, the magnetic field must have developed at the expense of the electrostatic field -<br />

the transformation of one kind of energy in<strong>to</strong> another kind. This conversion from repelling electrostatic<br />

charges <strong>to</strong> magnetic fields causes the particles <strong>to</strong> clump <strong>to</strong>gether, giving the false impression of an increase<br />

in mass. Further, as the electrostatic component drops <strong>to</strong> almost zero, the accelerating force diminishes <strong>to</strong><br />

near zero also, giving the false impression that a material body can’t travel faster than the speed of light.<br />

The reality is that bodies can travel many times the speed of light.<br />

According <strong>to</strong> General Relativity, a gravitational field will tend <strong>to</strong> slow the passage of time and the stronger the<br />

gravitational field, the more marked the effect. It was found that Caesium clocks run faster at high elevations<br />

than they do at ground level. This has been taken as a proof of the validity of Einstein’s ideas. The<br />

concentration of soft particles is higher near the ground than at high elevations and that makes clocks run<br />

faster at high elevations. As <strong>to</strong> the speed of light not depending on the velocity of it’s source, the Sagnac<br />

experiment of 1913 provides direct proof that the observed velocity of light is dependent on the velocity of it’s<br />

source, disproving Relativity. Mr Cater provides extensive demonstrations (as do other people) that<br />

Einstein’s deductions are not correct.<br />

3. It is clear that gravity is responsible for the tides, but the standard explanation is wholly inadequate, being<br />

based on the assumption that gravitational effects have unlimited penetration. In other words, the only<br />

attenuation when passing through matter is due <strong>to</strong> the inverse square law, which actually would be a<br />

violation of the law of conservation of energy.<br />

It is well known that a body cannot be given an acceleration relative <strong>to</strong> another body if both bodies<br />

experience the same acceleration. It follows then that since large bodies of water are accelerated relative <strong>to</strong><br />

the Earth <strong>to</strong> cause tides, the water is being experiencing a different acceleration than the Earth as a whole,<br />

otherwise, there would be no tidal movement of water across the surface of the Earth. Assuming that gravity<br />

has unlimited penetration causes problems when accounting for tidal movements. Since the distances<br />

between the Sun and the Earth and the Moon and the Earth are large in comparison <strong>to</strong> the diameter of the<br />

Earth, all parts of the Earth will experience nearly the same gravitational attraction from these external<br />

bodies if gravity has unlimited penetration. High tides tend <strong>to</strong> occur when the Moon is at it’s zenith, both<br />

directly underneath the Moon and simultaneously, on the opposite side of the Earth.<br />

The Earth’s orbit is inclined <strong>to</strong> the Equa<strong>to</strong>r by 28 degrees and so the Moon is never further North or South<br />

than 28 degrees. According <strong>to</strong> New<strong>to</strong>n’s theory, the highest tides should occur near the Equa<strong>to</strong>r but the<br />

reality is that the highest tides are experienced much further away from the Equa<strong>to</strong>r, both North and South of<br />

it. Mr Cater provides an in-depth discussion of these effects, demonstrating that New<strong>to</strong>n’s concept of gravity<br />

is wrong.<br />

4. It is generally accepted that energy, in any form, flows from a higher potential <strong>to</strong> a lower one. The law of<br />

redistribution of energy states that when radiant electromagnetic energy interacts with matter, the resulting<br />

radiation as a whole, is of a lower frequency than the original light. This is why temperatures at lower<br />

elevations are generally higher than those at higher elevations, as sunlight passing through air converts <strong>to</strong><br />

lower frequencies including infrared which activates the thermal motion of a<strong>to</strong>ms and molecules, thus<br />

producing heat. Any dynamic unit is less active as a whole, than the individual parts comprising it. The<br />

higher ethers consist of the smaller, more active particles while the lower ethers are composed of the large,<br />

more complex and consequently less active particles. Both ethers occupy the same 3-dimensional space<br />

(which is the only space that there is).<br />

When light of a given frequency range is produced, only the ethers associated with this light are directly<br />

activated. Light pho<strong>to</strong>ns are composed of combinations of ether particles. Pho<strong>to</strong>ns combine <strong>to</strong> form the<br />

penetrating particles which accompany this light. Particles composed of light in the lower frequency ranges<br />

are referred <strong>to</strong> as “soft” particles while those associated with gamma rays and above are referred <strong>to</strong> as<br />

“hard” particles.<br />

Soft particles are more penetrating than the pho<strong>to</strong>ns from which they are made, because, unlike the larger<br />

soft particles, pho<strong>to</strong>ns have a relatively great surface area in proportion <strong>to</strong> their mass. Soft particles, and<br />

particularly soft electrons, play a vital role in all life processes and in other chemical reactions. The energy or<br />

field intensity of and around the higher ether particles is greater than that of the lower ethers. The diameter<br />

11 - 112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!