Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

The evidence concerning spaceship propulsion demonstrates that the famous Einsteinian equation E = mC 2
falls far short of representing the energy potential of matter. From the kinetic energy equation E = 0.5mV 2 it
follows that a body travelling at only 1.5 times the speed of light (which isn’t even a cruising speed for most
spaceships) has a kinetic energy which exceeds the value of Einstein’s celebrated equation. At this velocity,
only a miniscule part of the energy potential of the mass has been released. The meaninglessness of the
famous equation is also evident, because inertia is dependent only on net charge and not necessarily on
mass or quantity of material.
13. Another item which demonstrates the validity of the information presented here is the fact that
determinations of the gravity “constant” “g” is always significantly higher when measured in mines. This is to
be expected as the soft electron concentration is much higher below the surface than it is above the surface.
Another fact which disturbs physicists (and consequently given little publicity) is that objects at the bottom of
mine shafts weight significantly less than they should according to Newton’s concept of gravity.
Another enigma which is damaging to the academic viewpoint is that experiments indicate that gravity
doesn’t impart the same acceleration to all substances. To try to deal with this fact, they have to introduce a
mysterious fifth force which is supposed to be an extremely feeble repulsive force with a limited range. It is
supposed to be more prevalent in some substances than in others. The concepts already explained here
show that this is to be expected. Different atoms and molecules have different total positive charge effects in
proportion to the number of fundamental particles from which they are made. Consequently, they will not be
given the same gravitational acceleration even if the mass is identical.
14. We now come to questions such as; How does the law of redistribution of energy work? What are the
real principles behind colour perception? Why is the velocity of light independent of it’s frequency? Why is
this velocity equal to the ratio between an electromagnetic and electrostatic unit of charge? The answers to
these questions have never been given before.
When materials are subjected to high temperatures, great fluctuations occur in the velocity of electrons in
their orbits. This in turn, creates interactions and interference effects between electrons moving in opposite
directions inside atoms and between electrons in adjacent atoms. These interactions generate changes in
the electrostatic field effects of the electrons, which will cause regular and distinct changes in their so-called
orbits. This is because the charge on the electron varies with it’s velocity. Abrupt changes in the velocity of
a particle disrupt the ethers which results in the formation of photons.
The larger the atoms, the more complex the interactions, and consequently, the more intricate the spectral
pattern. The photons comprising the electrons, determine the range of the ethers which will be disrupted.
These ethers are intimately connected with the electrostatic field intensity of the electrons. Thus it follows
from this new definition of Planck’s constant, just why this definition must be taken into consideration in all of
the calculations concerning the frequency of light produced in interactions.
The electrostatic field effects around an electron depend on the range and level of the ethers deflecting off
the sides of the particles. This range is not necessarily the same as the range of ethers affected by sudden
changes in the velocity of the electrons, but there is a direct correlation between the two. Planck’s constant
has a role throughout the procedure as all ether particles have the same kinetic energy.
The law of redistribution of energy states that when light interacts with matter, new light with a lower average
frequency than the original is produced. One of the most simple demonstrations of this is shining a blue or
violet light through a large number of filters of any type. The emerging light is always red. All of the colours
which we normally see are combinations of different frequencies of photons. A wide frequency range of soft
particles and photons will tend to be grouped together. This means that bands of light in the blue, indigo and
violet ranges will contain other colours down to the reds, although the reds will make up only a very small
percentage. The human eye sees only the dominant colour, and prisms cannot separate them. The colour
experiments of Edwin Land proved this to be the case.
In the May 1959 issue of Scientific American, Land showed that two black and white transparencies
produced from black and white film, were exposed to filtered light from two different (reasonably spaced
apart) parts of the spectrum, the resulting superimposed images were in full colour. This shows that it
requires subtle combinations of frequencies for the eye to perceive colour if the light isn’t in a narrow
frequency band. Otherwise, the eye will see things in various shades of black and white, which contain all
the colours but in the wrong combinations to be seen as colours. This is what occurs for people who are
subject to ‘colour blindness’.
Under certain conditions, light reflected from a mirror can have greater intensity than the incoming light. The
11 - 120