09.02.2018 Views

Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

eBook 3000 pages! author: Patrick J. Kelly "This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion. Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. " THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO. ​

eBook 3000 pages!
author: Patrick J. Kelly

"This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion.

Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. "

THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Moon, a seismic detec<strong>to</strong>r left on the surface showed that the Moon vibrated like a bell for about an hour<br />

afterwards. That would not have happened if the Moon were solid.<br />

There is very clear evidence that NASA has censored the Moon landing very heavily, but their attempts at<br />

suppression have been flawed and some obvious pointers exist. For example, NASA claimed that the space<br />

suits of the astronauts weighed 185 lbs when on Earth. Pho<strong>to</strong>graphs exist, showing an astronaut leaning<br />

over backwards and then regaining his balance. That would be a physical impossibility even under reduced<br />

gravity, and this implies that the “life support” systems were actually empty and not needed because there is<br />

an atmosphere. The high surface gravity is also seen when the astronauts ran. Even the slowed-down<br />

version released by NASA can’t conceal the length of the steps and the height off the ground which are the<br />

same as they would be on Earth.<br />

If the Moon had one sixth of the Earth’s gravity as is claimed by conventional science, then the point at which<br />

the gravitational pull of the Earth balances that of the Moon would be about 22,000 miles from the Moon.<br />

The Encyclopaedia Britannica states this distance as being about 40,000 miles, which agrees with various<br />

other sources. That could only be so if the Moon’s surface gravity were much higher than the supposed one<br />

sixth of Earth’s gravity.<br />

On more than one occasion, an Apollo astronaut tripped and fell on his face. Under one sixth gravity, that<br />

just would not happen, especially with a fit and active astronaut. Also, the rover vehicle used in later<br />

landings was 10’ long, 7.5’ wide and 4’ high with 32-inch diameter wheels. The Earth weight was 460<br />

pounds and under one sixth gravity, that would only be 75 pounds, but the astronauts had great difficulty<br />

unloading it from the lunar module. Engineers on Earth had already determined that <strong>to</strong> operate under one<br />

sixth gravity, the rover would have <strong>to</strong> be 20’ long and have a 20’ tread. With a loaded earth weight of 1,600<br />

pounds, it would need a turning radius of well over 80 feet <strong>to</strong> avoid tipping over at 10 mph or more than 20<br />

feet at 5 mph and descending steep hills would not be possible without major problems. But, the astronauts<br />

did descend steep hills and they made very sharp turns at maximum speed.<br />

One of the pho<strong>to</strong>graphs brought back by the Apollo 12 trip, showed an astronaut carrying instruments<br />

hanging from a bar. The instruments had an Earth-weight of 190 pounds, supposedly 31 pounds on the<br />

Moon, but the pronounced bowing of the bar would not have been caused by just 30 pounds.<br />

During the early Moon trips, the astronauts stated that when they left the atmosphere, the stars were not<br />

visible. This is understandable as the atmosphere scatters starlight, making stars appear larger and so<br />

become visible <strong>to</strong> the naked eye. Outside the atmosphere, there is no scattering and the stars are <strong>to</strong>o small<br />

<strong>to</strong> be seen without a telescope. On the Apollo 11 trip, shortly before reaching the Moon, Collins stated “Now<br />

we’re able <strong>to</strong> see starts again and recognise constellations for the first time on the trip. The sky’s full of stars<br />

... it looks like it’s night side on Earth”. This demonstrates that the Moon has a significant atmosphere<br />

caused by much higher gravity than one sixth that of Earth, although the refraction of light through that<br />

atmosphere is less than the refraction caused by Earth’s atmosphere.<br />

Mr Cater points out that NASA is well aware of the real nature of gravity and had electrogravitic drives long<br />

before the 1969 Moon shot. Not only that, but due <strong>to</strong> the fact that the Moon is bigger than currently believed,<br />

further away and possessing a higher surface gravity, that rocket power used during the flight was<br />

supplemented by an electrogravitic drive. Any honest person who has studied the evidence is well aware<br />

that there are many craft with electrogravitic drives and most of these seen in the last sixty years, are manmade.<br />

(All governments are very keen <strong>to</strong> suppress this information as national boundaries could not be<br />

maintained if electrogravitic drive vehicles were available <strong>to</strong> the public).<br />

2. Relativity, proposed by Albert Einstein, is not correct and Mr Cater spends quite some time demonstrating<br />

that relativity is wrong. Prior <strong>to</strong> Einstein, the Transverse Wave Theory of light was universally accepted.<br />

Waves cannot exist without a medium which vibrates in some manner <strong>to</strong> transmit them. Therefore, the<br />

“ether” which permeates all of the universe was accepted. The Michelson-Morley experiment was set up <strong>to</strong><br />

test this. A ray of light was split in<strong>to</strong> two parts which were made <strong>to</strong> traverse different paths of equal length.<br />

The motion of the Earth through the ether should then cause the recombined rays <strong>to</strong> show diffraction<br />

patterns. They didn’t. It did not occur <strong>to</strong> anyone that if light were retarded by passing through the ether, then<br />

bodies such as planets would be seriously retarded by their passage through it and would slow down and<br />

s<strong>to</strong>p. This experiment also gave rise <strong>to</strong> the ridiculous idea that the speed of light is a constant, in spite of the<br />

well-known fact that the speed of light through water is only 75% the speed of light through space. It was<br />

also proposed that the speed and direction of movement of an observer didn’t matter, That time slows down<br />

on a moving system, that a body will shorten in the direction of motion and that the mass of a body will<br />

increase the faster that body moves. These are ridiculous suggestions. The famous E = mC 2 equation was<br />

actually derived from the Lorentz equations in 1903, two years before Einstein got in<strong>to</strong> the act.<br />

11 - 111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!