Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

particle physics which assumed an ever-growing family of hypothetical particles called “quarks”.
It has been noted that a magnetic field surrounds a moving charge. The magnetic lines are in the form of
circles. An electron or proton tends to carry ether particles around with it in a circular motion as it moves
through the ethers. This is due to the mutual repulsion between the ether particles and the ether particles
comprising the particle. The reactive forces cause the particle to spin and they produce a vortex motion in
the ether itself. The greater the velocity of the particle, the faster it spins and the more ether particles are
caused to flow around it in the direction of the spin. It is this flow of ether particles around a moving charge
which produces the magnetic field effects observed. A three-dimensional view of this magnetic field shows
that it resembles a corkscrew spiral or vortex.
The ether particles which would normally cause repulsion between two adjacent particles at rest, spin when
they both move and the electrostatic repulsion drops off and is replaced by a magnetic field which draws the
two particles together. This effect is also seen in two adjacent wires carrying a heavy current flowing in the
same direction. The wires are drawn towards each other.
If two unlike charges move along together, they spin in opposite directions, generating magnetic fields of
opposing polarity which tends to push the particles apart.
An electron or proton moving in a magnetic field has two forces acting on it. One force tends to push it down
the magnetic lines of force because of excessive ether particle bombardments in one direction of flow. The
other force is perpendicular to the lines of force. If the velocity of the particle is high, then the latter force is
by far the more significant. This force is a result of Bernoulli’s principle. Magnetic fields tend to capture large
quantities of soft electrons.
11. The conventional theory of geomagnetism lacks merit. According to it, the major portion of
geomagnetism is the result of electric currents flowing in a molten iron core 2,000 miles beneath the surface
of the Earth. Even if such a core did exist, the conclusion would still be false. Scientists are somewhat
vague as to how a magnetic field could extend 2,000 miles beyond an electric current considering that it
takes a very powerful current to produce even weak magnetic effects a short distance from the current flow.
The electrical resistance of iron at the alleged temperatures of the core would be staggering, which raises
the question of how the necessary massive potential difference is produced to drive a large current in the
core in the first place.
A great wealth of evidence supports the conclusion that geomagnetism is produced by the Earth’s rotation.
The intensity of the field is dependent on the concentration of negative charges in the atmosphere and the
crust and on the rotational velocity. Since the concentration of charges in the atmosphere fluctuates in a 24-
hour cycle, the magnetic field can be expected to fluctuate accordingly. This is an established fact.
Supposedly uncharged atoms and molecules are not electrically neutral, but possess a positive charge. It
has always been assumed since the days of Newton, that inertia is directly proportional to mass. This has
been shown to be incorrect as inertia is dependent on total charge and is therefore independent of mass. It
follows that an atom has less inertia than any of the fundamental particles of which it is composed. The
small overall charge of an atom is the result of the equalising of positive and negative charges. It’s slight
ability to generate a magnetic field for a unit increase of velocity is due to electrons following the left-hand
rule while protons follow the right-hand rule. The inertia of an atom is limited because the magnetic fields of
the electrons and protons from which it is constructed, cancel each other out to a major degree. Stripping
electrons from an atom will give it a strong positive charge and much greater inertia even though it now has
less mass. Adding electrons to it can also raise it’s inertia if the extra electrons cause it to end up with a
greater overall charge than it had before. The Nobel Prize winner Gabriel Lippman confirmed this when he
found that bodies in a charged state have greater resistance to acceleration than they have in their
uncharged state.
Since matter behaves like a positive charge, it follows that gravity radiation will accelerate positive charges in
a direction opposite to that of the direction of its propagation. A gravitational field repels negative charges.
When the hair on a person’s head is given a strong negative charge, it stands straight up due to the negative
charges on the hairs carrying the hairs with them as the charges are pushed upwards by gravity.
The bulk of the radiations and soft particles of matter cover only a relatively narrow part of the
electromagnetic spectrum. They are produced by the interactions of the fundamental particles of the atom in
addition to the interactions of the atoms themselves. Incidentally, it is the soft particles comprised of photons
close to, and in, the visible range which permeate matter that make matter visible. If only the hard particles
were present, solid matter would be invisible, although completely tangible.
11 - 118