Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

that 'yawing' action. It means that substantial energy is needed to force the establishment of those fields within the
iron core. More important, however, from the point of view of this invention, it means that the intrinsic magnetic
polarisation effects in adjacent magnetic domains in the iron cease to be mutually parallel or orthogonal so as to
stay directed along axes of easy magnetisation. Then, in effect, the magnetising action is not just that of the
magnetising winding wrapped around the core but becomes also that of adjacent ferromagnetic polarisation as
the latter act in concert as vacuum-energy powered solenoids and are deflected into one another to develop the
additional forward magnetomotive forces.
The consequences of this are that the intrinsic ferromagnetic power source with its thermodynamic ordering action
contributes to doing work in building up forces across the air gap. The task, in technological terms, is then to
harness that energy as the gap is closed, as by poles coming together in a reluctance motor, and avoid returning
that energy as the poles separate, this being possible if the controlling source of primary magnetisation is well
removed from the pole gap and the demagnetisation occurs when the poles are at the closest position.
This energy situation is evident in the Moullin data, because the constant AC voltage implies a constant flux
amplitude across the air gap if there is no flux leakage in the gap region. A constant flux amplitude implies a
constant force between the poles and so the gap width in relation to this force is a measure of the mechanical
energy potential of the air gap. The reactive volt-amp power assessment over the quarter-cycle period
representing the polarisation demand can then be compared with the mechanical energy so made available. As
already stated, this is how Moullin deduced the theoretical current curve. In fact, as his data show, he needed less
current than the mechanical energy suggested and so he had in his experiment evidence of the vacuum energy
source that passed unnoticed and is only now revealing itself in machines that can serve our energy needs.
In the research leading to this patent application the Moullin experiment has been repeated to verify a condition
where a single magnetising winding serves three air gaps. The Moullin test configuration is shown in Fig.2, but in
repeating the experiment in the research leading to this invention, a search coil was mounted on the bridging
member and this was used to compare the ratio of the voltage applied to the magnetising winding and that
induced in the search coil.
The same fall-off feature in current demand was observed, and there was clear evidence of substantial excess
energy in the air gap. This was in addition to the inductive energy that necessarily had to be locked into the
magnetic core to sustain the 'yawing' action of the magnetic flux already mentioned.
It is therefore emphasised that, in priming the flux 'yawing' action, energy is stored inductively in the magnetic
core, even though this has been deemed to be the energy of flux leakage outside the core. The air gap energy is
also induction energy. Both energies are returned to the source winding when the system is demagnetised, given
a fixed air gap.
If, however, the air gap closes after or during magnetisation, much of that inductive energy goes into the
mechanical work output. Note then that the energy released as mechanical work is not just that stored in the air
gap but is that stored in sustaining the 'yaw'. Here, then is reason to expect an even stronger contribution to the
dynamic machine performance, one that was not embraced by the calculation of the steady-state situation.
Given the above explanation of the energy source, the structural features which are the subject of this invention
will now be described.
The 'yawing' action is depicted in Fig.3, which depicts how magnetic flux navigates a right-angled bend in a
magnetic core upon passage through an air gap. By over-simplification it is assumed that the core has a crystal
structure that has a preferred axis of magnetisation along the broken line path. With no air gap, the current
needed by a magnetising winding has only to provide enough magnetomotive force to overcome the effects of
non-magnetic inclusions and impurities in the core substance and very high magnetic permeabilities can apply.
However, as soon as the air gap develops, this core substance has to find a way of setting up magnetomotive
force in regions extending away from the locality of the magnetising winding. It cannot do this unless its effect is
so powerful that the magnetic flux throughout the magnetic circuit through the core substance is everywhere
deflected from alignment with a preferred easy axis of magnetisation. Hence the flux vectors depicted by the
arrows move out of alignment with the broken line shown.
There is a 'knock-on' effect progressing all the way around the core from the seat of the magnetising winding and,
as already stated, this harnesses the intrinsic ferromagnetic power that, in a system with no air gap, could only be
affected by magnetisation above the knee of the B-H curve. Magnetic flux rotation occurs above that knee,
whereas in an ideal core the magnetism develops with very high permeability over a range up to that knee,
because it needs very little power to displace a magnetic domain wall sideways and promote a 900 or a1800 flux
reversal. Indeed, one can have a magnetic permeability of 10,000 below the knee and 100 above the knee, the
latter reducing progressively until the substance saturates magnetically.
A - 156