09.02.2018 Views

Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

eBook 3000 pages! author: Patrick J. Kelly "This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion. Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. " THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO. ​

eBook 3000 pages!
author: Patrick J. Kelly

"This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion.

Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. "

THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

With reference <strong>to</strong> Fig.4, the Test Circuit 60 comprised a 47 ohm, 10 watt, Philips wire-wound resis<strong>to</strong>r 62, placed in<br />

series with two 6-volt batteries, 64, and 66 connected in parallel. A induc<strong>to</strong>r 68, was placed in series with load<br />

resis<strong>to</strong>r 62. A positively-biased diode 72, was placed in parallel with the induc<strong>to</strong>r 68 and above an n-channel<br />

MOSFET transis<strong>to</strong>r switching device, 74. This wire was then taken back <strong>to</strong> the positive terminal of the batteries.<br />

The battery voltage was measured at 6.12 volts.<br />

The duty cycle was adjusted <strong>to</strong> a 50:50 Mark-Space ratio, giving equal times for the On condition and the Off<br />

condition. The load resis<strong>to</strong>r reached a temperature of 30OC and the ambient room temperature was 22OC. The<br />

waveforms for the three sensing resis<strong>to</strong>rs SR1, SR2 and SR3 are shown in Fig.4 below the circuit diagram.<br />

The voltage waveform across the SR1 sensing resis<strong>to</strong>r in series with the load resis<strong>to</strong>r 62, is roughly triangular but<br />

followed an exponential rise and fall during the On and Off periods of each cycle. The voltage did not fall below<br />

zero. The peak positive voltage was measured as 0.006 volts which corresponds <strong>to</strong> approximately 0.169 watts<br />

which is less than would be expected from the temperature of the load resis<strong>to</strong>r. It would be expected that 0.375<br />

watts would be required <strong>to</strong> produce the measured 30OC of the load resis<strong>to</strong>r 62.<br />

The voltage waveform across the SR2 sensing resis<strong>to</strong>r placed in series with battery 1, marked 64, was roughly<br />

triangular in form with some exponential curvature as shown. The average current draw from the battery was<br />

measured and calculated <strong>to</strong> be 0.025 amps, which is a power draw of 0.153 watts..<br />

.<br />

The voltage waveform across the SR3 sensing resis<strong>to</strong>r placed in series with battery 2, marked 66, showed a<br />

waveform with equivalent amounts above and below the zero voltage level. The On voltage peak was 0.0055<br />

volts and the Off voltage peak was -0.0055 volts (i.e. below zero volts). No power was being drawn from this<br />

battery and in fact, the shape of the two sections of the waveform indicate that there was actually a slight degree<br />

of charging on this battery although this was ignored as being <strong>to</strong>o small <strong>to</strong> be significant.<br />

The inescapable conclusion from these tests is that <strong>to</strong> achieve identical heating of the load resis<strong>to</strong>r, the standard<br />

circuitry required 0.0612 amps while the test circuit required only 0.025 amps. This means that the pulsing circuit<br />

is more than 100% more efficient than the conventional circuit. These measurements represent a Coefficient Of<br />

Performance of 2.45 as the output power is 2.45 times the input power.<br />

These two examples shown here do not necessarily represent optimised values and further gains may be attained<br />

by using two or more induc<strong>to</strong>rs, two or more energy sources or energy s<strong>to</strong>rage and its switching circuitry, and<br />

other measures.<br />

Example 3: A further set of tests was conducted <strong>to</strong> investigate the relationship between power supplied by the<br />

battery marked as 82 and power dissipated by a resis<strong>to</strong>r R1 in the circuit of Fig.5.<br />

A - 1440

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!