Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

in diameter and beyond that point, the screening effect of the outer layers keeps pace with the rate of
increase of the transformation of infrared into gravity radiation. This means that all planets have practically
the same surface gravity.
6. Mr Cater explains how soft and hard particles and the limited penetration of gravity account for Erath
upheavals, continental drift, earthquakes and volcanoes. He also remarks that if the Earth were a
completely solid ball and the Newtonian version of gravity were correct, then the Earth would be completely
rigid and no Earth changes would occur other than some minor erosion, and there would certainly be no
mountains left by now.
7. One of the most fundamental physical laws involves the relationship between the electrostatic and
magnetic fields. One transforms into the other and vice versa. Inertia is a third factor involved in the
relationship between the electrostatic and magnetic fields. The kinetic energy of a moving charge is
manifested in it’s magnetic field. The magnetic field increases at the expense of it’s electrostatic field (as
dictated by the law of conservation of energy). The role of inertia and the conditions governing it’s
magnitude are now apparent. The inertia of a body is dependent on it’s ability to generate a magnetic field
when it is given a velocity. The greater the inertia, the greater this ability.
The magnitude of the inertia of a body is directly proportional to the energy of the magnetic field which the
body develops for a given increase in velocity. It follows then that inertia is dependent on the total
electrostatic charge of a body. This is also true for so-called “uncharged” matter. In the supposedly
uncharged state, all atoms and molecules have a net positive charge. Therefore, even atoms and molecules
develop a magnetic field when they are given a velocity.
In 1901, Max Planck found that he could only derive the correct distribution in frequency of the radiant
energy in the cavity of a black body as a function of the temperature of that body, if he assumed that energy
exists in discrete units. He came up with NHV where N is an integer, V is the frequency of the light involved
and H is a universal constant (expressed in terms of energy multiplied by time, that is, erg-seconds). This is
now known as Planck’s Constant and is 6.6 x 10 -27 erg-seconds.
The kinetic energy of a light photon is inversely proportional to the frequency. The lower frequency light,
consists of larger and more massive photons travelling at the same velocity as the higher frequency photons.
On average, the number of photons in any given ray, and the number of accompanying soft electrons will be
a constant, regardless of the frequency. This is in accordance with the conclusion that the average distance,
or mean free path between ether particles of the same kind, is a constant, regardless of the ethers involved.
The average number of photons comprising a soft electron will also be independent of the frequency. This
means that the diameter of the surface area of a soft electron, will also be inversely proportional to the
frequency. Soft electrons accompanying light, travel at a velocity which is less than that of light. The soft
electrons pick up speed, by bombardments of faster moving photons.
From a superficial glance, it seems that the average velocity of soft electrons should be independent of the
frequency of the light associated with them. This is not so. The soft electrons associated with the higher
frequency, travel at a higher velocity, and herein lies the key to the photo-electric effect. Although the lower
mass of the higher frequency soft electrons is offset by the lower kinetic energy of the bombarding higher
frequency photons, the surface area is greater in proportion to mass. This means that in proportion to mass,
the electrons associated with the higher frequency light will receive a greater bombardment of photons and
so, a greater accelerating force. The ratio between surface area and volume, or mass, is inversely
proportional to the ratio between the diameter of two given spheres. Since the other factors balance out, it
follows that the resultant average kinetic energy of soft electrons in proportion to mass, is directly
proportional to the frequency of the light with which they are associated. As soft electrons collide with a
surface, the hard electrons which they contain, are released and they bombard the surface, producing the
photo-electric effect. They will be travelling at the same velocity as the soft electrons which housed them, so
their average kinetic energy will be proportional the frequency of light.
Quantum mechanics is considered the most monumental achievement of twentieth century physics. In view
of the principles presented above, it is not surprising that mathematical juggling with Planck’s constant would
account for many experimental results (in a quantitative sense). Quantum mechanics experts have enjoyed
considerable success in this respect, especially in the realm of atomic spectra, without knowing why. In
reality, quantum mechanics does not even qualify as a theory or a concept. It is merely an attempt to give
mathematical descriptions of certain phenomena with Planck’s constant and his valid assumption as a
starting point. Modern “theoretical” physicists have absolutely no conception of why their mathematics
agrees with certain experimental results. Yet, they have led themselves to believe that by giving
mathematical descriptions of such phenomena, they have actually explained them.
11 - 114