09.02.2018 Views

Practical Guige to Free Energy Devices

eBook 3000 pages! author: Patrick J. Kelly "This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion. Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. " THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO. ​

eBook 3000 pages!
author: Patrick J. Kelly

"This eBook contains most of what I have learned about this subject after researching it for a number of years. I am not trying to sell you anything, nor am I trying to convince you of anything. When I started looking into this subject, there was very little useful information and any that was around was buried deep in incomprehensible patents and documents. My purpose here is to make it easier for you to locate and understand some of the relevant material now available. What you believe is up to yourself and is none of my business. Let me stress that almost all of the devices discussed in the following pages, are devices which I have not personally built and tested. It would take several lifetimes to do that and it would not be in any way a practical option. Consequently, although I believe everything said is fully accurate and correct, you should treat everything as being “hearsay” or opinion.

Some time ago, it was commonly believed that the world was flat and rested on the backs of four elephants and that when earthquakes shook the ground, it was the elephants getting restless. If you want to believe that, you are fully at liberty to do so, however, you can count me out as I don’t believe that. "

THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO PERFORM EXPERIMENTS OR CONSTRUCT ANY DEVICE, YOU DO SO WHOLLY ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY -- NEITHER THE COMPANY HOSTING THIS WEB SITE, NOR THE SITE DESIGNER ARE IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS OR ANY RESULTING LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY DESCRIPTION, SHOULD ANY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF WHAT YOU DO.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The results indicate that the highest mass-bound power assembled by the secondary transmitter circuit does not<br />

exceed 7 watts - and this is directly output from the secondary 26 when the load is 50 Megohm, or from the<br />

transmitter plate when the load is 1 Megohm. The mass-bound electric power emulated by the receiving circuit<br />

(plate, coil and Function Y without the plasma pulser circuitry) never exceeds the mass-bound electric power<br />

outputted directly by the transmitter, and peaks when the resistive load value (1 Megohm) approaches the prebreakdown<br />

resistance range of the vacuum tube, at 4.72W. These findings then indicate that when the<br />

transmitter circuit is consuming a maximum of 35W, a typical output from the secondary of the transmitter is 7W,<br />

and at 3'' of distance within the proximal field of the latter, the pick-up by a tuned receiver will be of the order of<br />

5W of mass-bound current duplicated within the receiving coil. The loss in the first stage is therefore on the order<br />

of sevenfold.<br />

Continuing with the description of the circuit of Fig.19, a 128 cm 2 plate area, 6 cm gap PAGD reac<strong>to</strong>r is used,<br />

connected as described in our prior art <strong>to</strong> a high-vacuum rotary pump (Correa, P & Correa, A (1995) "<strong>Energy</strong><br />

conversion system", U.S. Pat. No. 5,449,989). Pressure readings were obtained with a thermocouple gauge<br />

during the operational runs. The KS-9303 mo<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> be tested are then connected <strong>to</strong> the PAGD reac<strong>to</strong>r in the<br />

usual capacitatively-coupled, inverter fashion described in our prior art (Correa, P & Correa, A (1995)<br />

"Electromechanical transduction of plasma pulses", U.S. Pat. No 5,416.391). Their rpm is detected by a<br />

stroboscopic tachometer and fed <strong>to</strong> a Mac Performa 6400 running a mo<strong>to</strong>r algorithm program calculating the<br />

power output. Mo<strong>to</strong>r measurements were made at five minutes in<strong>to</strong> each run for the unloaded mo<strong>to</strong>rs, and at ten<br />

minutes for the inertially dampened mo<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

All experiments were carried out in the same work session. The experimental determination of the continuous<br />

rotary power output as a function of the reac<strong>to</strong>r pulse rate confirmed that the improved circuit develops maximum<br />

rotary capture of the mass-free energy in the receiver circuit at the lowest rates of pulsation, just as we have<br />

previously found for the conversion system of U.S. Pat. No. 5,449,989. Furthermore, the data showed that even<br />

mo<strong>to</strong>rs of type KS-8624 are able <strong>to</strong> output power mechanically in excess of the mass-bound power output by the<br />

transmitter (7W) or captured by the receiver (5 <strong>to</strong> a max. of 7W), once the PAGD rate decreases <strong>to</strong> 1.5 PPS.<br />

Such an anomaly can only be explained by the system having become able <strong>to</strong> begin capturing the mass-free<br />

energy flux in the receiver circuit that we know already is output by the transmitter circuit. But this excess<br />

mechanical power is still less than the power input in<strong>to</strong> the transmitter, and clearly so. It represents a power gain<br />

with respect <strong>to</strong> the secondary, but a loss with respect <strong>to</strong> the primary. The full breadth of the capture of the massfree<br />

electric energy flux circulating in the receiver circuit is not seen until the mo<strong>to</strong>rs are resonantly loaded<br />

because they are inertially dampened.<br />

The KS-9303 mo<strong>to</strong>rs, once inertially dampened, and thus loaded, are able <strong>to</strong> recover enough power from the<br />

mass-free energy field <strong>to</strong> develop a mechanical power, not just greatly in excess of the mass-bound power of the<br />

secondary, but also greatly in excess of the mass-bound power input <strong>to</strong> the vibra<strong>to</strong>r stage and the primary, at 28<br />

<strong>to</strong> 35W. Once the pulse rate approaches the same 1.5 PPS marker, mechanical power in excess of the massbound<br />

electric power input <strong>to</strong> the primary becomes evident, peaking at nearly three times that input. In fact, the<br />

highest output recorded was also obtained with the lowest input <strong>to</strong> the transmitter circuit, the highest exact<br />

coefficient observed in this experiment being 100.8W / 28W = 3.6. Furthermore, with respect <strong>to</strong> the secondary<br />

mass-bound output, the same mechanical rotary output represents a much greater overunity coefficient of<br />

performance, on the order of 14.4 times greater. This is at least partly the result of the receiver and mo<strong>to</strong>r capture<br />

of the mass-free electric energy output by the transmitter, and may be partly the result of mass-free energy<br />

engrafted by the PAGD regime in the PAGD reac<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

Reviewing the mechanical power output results as a function of increasing vacuum in the PAGD reac<strong>to</strong>r and at<br />

different output power levels, any mo<strong>to</strong>r performance below the 5-7W limit of the traditional mass-bound output<br />

power of the secondary represents an output mechanical power loss with respect <strong>to</strong> both the mass-bound<br />

secondary output and the mass-bound primary input. All the results for pressures down <strong>to</strong> 0.03 Torr fall in<strong>to</strong> this<br />

category, and thus represent a very inefficient coupling <strong>to</strong> the PAGD regime. Any mo<strong>to</strong>r performance between<br />

7W and 28-35W represent a loss with respect <strong>to</strong> the electrical power input <strong>to</strong> the transmitter system, but a net<br />

gain of power with respect <strong>to</strong> the mass-bound secondary power output. None of the non-inertially dampened<br />

mo<strong>to</strong>rs tested were able <strong>to</strong> perform outside of this area, under the test conditions. With more efficient primary <strong>to</strong><br />

secondary couplings in the transmitter station, however, one could advantageously employ these mo<strong>to</strong>rs alone <strong>to</strong><br />

extract some of the mass-free power of the secondary or <strong>to</strong> operate them in enclosed vessels without<br />

conventional external electrical connections.<br />

To reach satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry levels of recovery of mass-free energy, one must dampen the superimposed DW impulses.<br />

Hence, all results showing outputs in excess of 35W were obtained using the inertially dampened KS-9303<br />

mo<strong>to</strong>rs, and represent a net overunity power gain over both the power input <strong>to</strong> the primary and the mass-bound<br />

power output by the secondary, or the mass-bound power emulated by the receiver circuitry. This happens when<br />

the PAGD pulse rate falls <strong>to</strong> 2 PPS, with the rotary power output steeply increasing as the rate falls <strong>to</strong> 1 PPS.<br />

A - 557

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!