13.05.2013 Aufrufe

Grünen Kapitalismus - Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung

Grünen Kapitalismus - Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung

Grünen Kapitalismus - Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

world’s most influential source of environmentalist critique and analysis.<br />

Brown’s 1973 book World Without Borders fully endorsed the corporate<br />

free-trade framework and its claim to reduce global poverty. 184 His<br />

more recent analysis proceeds in a similar vein; it is of interest here because<br />

of his continuing sanguine view of corporate interests. As he puts<br />

it, “Like the rest of society, corporations have a stake in building an ecoeconomy”<br />

(Brown 2001, 261). He reports the withdrawal of several major<br />

corporations from the Global Climate Coalition, signaling their rejection<br />

of a direct anti-environmentalist posture. Their new approach<br />

encompasses such practices as recycling, greater use of renewable energy<br />

sources, and offsetting CO2 emissions via tree-planting projects. In a<br />

few special cases, like that of carpet-manufacturer Ray Anderson – who<br />

retrieves worn-out carpeting and reprocesses it – the steps reflect a business<br />

plan fully defined by ecological concerns.<br />

All such measures represent a welcome improvement over earlier business<br />

practices. The carpet model, however, which is not only cited by<br />

Brown but also featured in the documentary film The Corporation<br />

(2004), 185 is exceptional. The more common pattern is to apply energysaving<br />

measures and alternative power-sources whenever possible and/<br />

or convenient, while in other respects continuing business as usual. 186<br />

The totality of such responses, even if we include the exceptionally green<br />

ones among them, is hardly commensurate with the scale of the crisis.<br />

The unchanged factors are these: 1. The scope and scale of the remedial<br />

measures are decided upon by the companies themselves, within an<br />

overall framework of striving for unlimited growth. 2. Other companies<br />

are free to continue operating as before. 3. The processes of coordination,<br />

re-education, and public accountability which would be required for<br />

system-wide ecological restraint are not here envisaged.<br />

A response focusing much more on economic aggregates is that of the<br />

widely publicized Stern Review – an ambitious study commissioned by<br />

the British government and directed by Nicholas Stern (2007). Among<br />

the distinctive features of the Stern Review is its effort to make the case<br />

for an ecological crash-program in terms that should resonate with cor-<br />

184 For a detailed analysis of Brown’s work, see Wallis 1997.<br />

185 www.thecorporation.com<br />

186 An important New York Times report (Mouawad 2009) notes that all the “oil giants” are<br />

resisting further moves toward alternative energy. Even BP “has been getting back to<br />

petroleum since 2007.”<br />

245

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!