15.11.2014 Views

World Energy Outlook 2007

World Energy Outlook 2007

World Energy Outlook 2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SPOTLIGHT<br />

What is Stopping Governments from Implementing New Policies?<br />

We all stand to gain from national and regional efforts to address the energysecurity<br />

and environmental challenges posed by rising energy use. But, in<br />

practice, there are formidable hurdles to the adoption and implementation<br />

of the policies and measures in the Alternative Policy Scenario, largely caused<br />

by strong resistance from industry and consumer interests.<br />

Improving energy efficiency is often the cheapest, fastest and most<br />

environment-friendly way to save fossil energy. Cost-reflective, marketbased<br />

mechanisms such as carbon penalties are, in principle, the most<br />

economically efficient approach to encouraging more energy-efficient and<br />

cleaner technologies in power generation and industrial applications. But<br />

the public and industry are, unsurprisingly, very reluctant to pay higher<br />

prices for their energy services, without clear evidence of the needs and<br />

long-term benefits, making politicians correspondingly reluctant to push<br />

up taxes and prices. Even where it is politically feasible to use market-based<br />

instruments, market barriers or the low price elasticity of demand (for<br />

example, for transport) can inhibit their effectiveness.<br />

Where there is a readiness to act, regulatory approaches may sometimes be<br />

preferred to market mechanisms. For example, measures to regulate appliance<br />

efficiency and vehicle fuel economy are among the most cost-effective ways of<br />

curbing energy-demand and emission growth. Yet they, too, can be politically<br />

difficult. For example, some car makers may oppose increases in mandatory<br />

fuel-efficiency standards on the grounds that a switch to smaller and more<br />

efficient vehicles will increase costs and lower sales and margins, while carindustry<br />

workers may worry about the impact on their jobs.<br />

Financial incentives can be a powerful instrument for change, but they too<br />

have limitations. They can be costly, either to governments and taxpayers<br />

(through increased public spending) or to consumers (through higher taxes<br />

or prices). Even where they encourage new initiatives, local opposition to<br />

some types of renewables projects, such as wind farms and hydropower,<br />

can outgun the wider community’s readiness to accept them. In many<br />

parts of the world, barriers to the adoption of policies encouraging the<br />

construction of nuclear reactors are particularly high.<br />

Overcoming these barriers to policy action and pushing through the kinds<br />

of policies described above takes considerable political will and courage –<br />

even when the public is familiar with the energy-security and<br />

environmental advantages of action to encourage more efficient energy use<br />

and reduce fossil-fuel use. Governments must give a clear lead, in order to<br />

generate a collective sense of responsibility. The prospective benefits to the<br />

economy and to society as a whole must be clear. Since private capital will<br />

finance much energy-related investment, governments remain responsible<br />

for creating the appropriate investment environment.<br />

98 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2007</strong> - GLOBAL ENERGY PROSPECTS: IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENTS IN CHINA & INDIA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!