15.11.2014 Views

World Energy Outlook 2007

World Energy Outlook 2007

World Energy Outlook 2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Technologies involving the absorption of CO 2<br />

in solvents and subsequent<br />

solvent regeneration, sometimes in combination with membrane separation,<br />

are the most prevalent.<br />

The oxy-combustion process: This involves the combustion of fossil fuel in a<br />

mixture of near-pure oxygen and recycled flue gas, producing a secondary flue<br />

gas stream consisting essentially of CO 2<br />

and water, which can then be<br />

separated.<br />

CO 2<br />

capture from combustion processes is highly energy-intensive and<br />

expensive. Separation of CO 2<br />

from natural gas at the well head is necessary to meet<br />

quality standards and offers a cheap source of CO 2<br />

for storage (Box 5.4). CCS in<br />

power generation is cheapest for large, highly efficient coal-fired plants. The capital<br />

cost of a demonstration power plant with CCS is estimated to range from $0.5 to<br />

$1 billion, 50% of which is for the capture and compression equipment alone.<br />

The typical cost of CCS in power plants ranges from $30 to $90 per tonne of<br />

CO 2<br />

, but costs can be much higher depending on technology, CO 2<br />

purity and<br />

site. The cost of retrofitting CCS equipment on an existing power plant is<br />

currently thought to be much higher per tonne of CO 2<br />

abated than the cost of<br />

equipping a greenfield power plant. No large coal-fired power plant with CCS has<br />

yet been built, though a large number are at an advanced planning stage.<br />

CO 2<br />

is most commonly transported by pipeline, as this is the most cost-effective<br />

mode over distances of less than 1 000 km. The cost depends on the terrain,<br />

pressure requirements, distance and capacity. There are very large economies of<br />

scale. For a 250-km onshore pipeline and over 10 Mt of CO 2<br />

transported per<br />

year, costs are currently of the order of $1.50 to $4 per tonne of CO 2<br />

(UK-<br />

DBERR, <strong>2007</strong>). Storage costs vary enormously, according to infrastructure<br />

requirements (new injection and monitoring wells or retrofitting existing<br />

facilities), volumes to be injected, injection depth and whether the CO 2<br />

is used<br />

for enhanced oil recovery. In the case of enhanced oil recovery, the net cost of<br />

storage can be negative. In other cases, costs may be up to $10/tonne for onshore<br />

aquifers and $40/tonne for depleted offshore oil and gas fields (UK-DBERR,<br />

<strong>2007</strong>). Offshore storage is generally two to three times more costly than onshore<br />

disposal. Monitoring costs depend on the risk of leakage; they are estimated to be<br />

generally less than $1 per tonne of CO 2<br />

injected.<br />

Using cost-effective technologies and favourable siting, the lowest costs<br />

achievable for CCS at greenfield coal-fired plants are currently estimated to<br />

be of the order of $50/tonne (IEA, 2006b). This includes capture costs of<br />

$20 to $40/tonne, large-scale transportation by pipeline costing $1 to<br />

$5/tonne per 100 km and storage costs of $2 to $5/tonne. Short-distance<br />

transport and storage together might cost less than $10/tonne, if monitoring<br />

costs are small. Assuming reasonable rates of technology learning, the total<br />

cost of CCS might be expected to drop to below $25/tonne of CO 2<br />

by 2030<br />

(IEA, 2006c).<br />

218 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2007</strong> - GLOBAL ENERGY PROSPECTS: IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENTS IN CHINA & INDIA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!