15.11.2014 Views

World Energy Outlook 2007

World Energy Outlook 2007

World Energy Outlook 2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reference Scenario. More than two-thirds of the oil savings over the whole<br />

projections period arise in the transport sector, notably through the increased<br />

fuel efficiency of new vehicles and faster introduction of alternative fuels and<br />

vehicles (see the section below on Transport). Most of the rest comes from<br />

savings in oil use in industry and building.<br />

Contrary to coal and oil, demand for natural gas is higher than in the Reference<br />

Scenario, because of policies that encourage its use in the residential sector and<br />

in power generation in provinces without abundant coal reserves. By 2015, gas<br />

demand is 20 bcm, or 15%, higher than in the Reference Scenario and<br />

30 bcm, or 13%, higher by 2030. The rate of growth over the entire projection<br />

period is 0.5 percentage points higher than in the Reference Scenario.<br />

A number of Alternative Policy Scenario policies promote the use of renewables<br />

and nuclear power. In all, primary demand for energy from non-fossil fuel<br />

primary sources is 30% higher under the Alternative Policy Scenario. Nuclear<br />

power accounts for 43% of this increase, reaching levels 36% higher than in<br />

the Reference Scenario in 2015 and 79% higher in 2030. Hydropower grows<br />

more quickly in the Alternative Policy Scenario: by 4.8% per year to 2030,<br />

compared to 3.8% in the Reference Scenario. Biomass accounts for 8% of<br />

primary energy demand in the Alternative Policy Scenario, compared to 6% in<br />

the Reference Scenario. There are two opposing forces at work here: the use of<br />

biomass increases in combined heat and power (CHP) plants and for the<br />

production of biofuels for transport – in both cases reaching levels in 2030<br />

more than twice as high compared with the Reference Scenario – while<br />

households’ use of non commercial biomass for cooking and heating drops.<br />

Other renewables – wind, geothermal and solar energy – are 57% higher than<br />

in the Reference Scenario.<br />

Final energy demand in total is 4.3% lower in 2015 and 17.2% lower in 2030<br />

in the Alternative Policy Scenario than in the Reference Scenario. Electricity<br />

demand is 2% lower in 2015, with a gap between the two scenarios projected<br />

to grow to 14.5% by 2030, as energy efficiency measures take effect and more<br />

capital equipment is replaced. Heat demand is 5% lower in 2015 and 18%<br />

lower in 2030, mainly thanks to stricter building codes.<br />

Implications for <strong>Energy</strong> Markets and Supply Security<br />

In the Alternative Policy Scenario, conventional oil production from Chinese<br />

fields is assumed to remain at the same levels as in the Reference Scenario,<br />

decreasing to around 2.7 mb/d in 2030. 3 There is, however, an increase in<br />

production of oil from non-conventional sources – mainly CTL – and in the<br />

output of biofuels, spurred by government policies aimed at limiting oil import<br />

3. This is because international oil and gas prices are assumed to be the same in the Alternative Policy<br />

Scenario as in the Reference Scenario.<br />

366 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2007</strong> - CHINA’S ENERGY PROSPECTS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!