15.11.2014 Views

World Energy Outlook 2007

World Energy Outlook 2007

World Energy Outlook 2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and human development. Yet no energy system can be entirely secure in the<br />

short term, because disruptions or shortages can arise unexpectedly, whether<br />

through sabotage, political intervention, strikes, technical failures, accidents or<br />

natural disasters. In the longer term, under-investment in crude oil<br />

production, refining or transportation capacity, or other market failures can<br />

lead to shortages and consequently unacceptably high prices. So energy<br />

security, in practice, is best seen as a problem of risk management, that is<br />

reducing to an acceptable level the risks and consequences of disruptions and<br />

adverse long-term market trends. Secure energy supply is a public good, as the<br />

benefit derived from it by one consumer does not reduce the benefit to<br />

everyone else. Markets alone do not reflect the cost to society of a supply failure<br />

because it is beyond the power of an individual supplier or consumer to<br />

guarantee security. Put another way, all market players benefit from action to<br />

safeguard energy security, whether or not they have contributed to it. For these<br />

reasons, governments must take ultimate responsibility for ensuring an<br />

adequate degree of security within the framework of open, competitive<br />

markets. This applies to producers, as well as to consumers: they benefit from<br />

more secure energy supplies if the demand for their resources is not reduced by<br />

the adverse macroeconomic effects of higher prices or logistical supply<br />

problems that might result from a supply disruption.<br />

Short-term threats to security concern unexpected disruptions, whether of a<br />

political, technical, accidental or malevolent nature. Long-term threats relate to<br />

a lack of deliverability caused by deliberate or unintentional under-investment<br />

in capacity. Both short-term disruptions and under-investment result in higher<br />

prices, causing hardship to consumers and harming economic prospects. The<br />

two are linked: under-investment also renders the energy system more<br />

vulnerable to sudden supply disruptions, accentuating their impact on prices,<br />

while experience of short-term disruptions shakes market confidence in supply,<br />

increasing the risk of under-investment in production.<br />

Concerns about energy security have evolved over time with changes in the<br />

global energy system and perceptions about the risks and potential costs of<br />

supply disruptions. In the 1970s and 1980s, the focus was on oil and the dangers<br />

associated with over-dependence on oil imports. Today, worries about energy<br />

security extend to natural gas, which is increasingly traded internationally, and<br />

the reliability of electricity supply. Increasing attention is being given to the<br />

adequacy of investment in all types of energy infrastructure. There are growing<br />

concerns about whether competitive markets for electricity and gas, as they<br />

currently operate, provide sufficient incentive for building capacity.<br />

Most governments have developed policies to protect against failures in the<br />

energy supply system that arise from weakness in market mechanisms or that<br />

cannot be handled by the market alone. Long-term policies aim to encourage:<br />

4<br />

Chapter 4 - The <strong>World</strong>’s <strong>Energy</strong> Security 161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!