28.02.2015 Views

CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption

CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption

CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Participation, institutions, and syndromes <strong>of</strong> corruption 37<br />

<strong>Corruption</strong> as an embedded problem: sources <strong>of</strong> variation<br />

Over the past generation most societies have experienced liberalization <strong>of</strong><br />

politics, economies, or both – at times on a dramatic scale. Early in the<br />

1990s it was hoped that the shift to markets would fuel growth, and<br />

thereby democratization, while lean, accountable governments would<br />

best encourage markets. Most early enthusiasm focused on liberalization,<br />

with institution-building taking a distinctly secondary role. At times the<br />

state was seen as a necessary evil at best. But reality has turned out to be<br />

much more difficult. Liberalization has usually not been moderately<br />

paced and balanced: <strong>of</strong>ten, rapid political transitions and soaring social<br />

expectations have given way to much slower and more difficult processes<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic change, or moves toward markets have been stymied by state<br />

institutions that are ineffective, repressive, or both.<br />

In fact sound institutions are not impediments to free political and economic<br />

participation, but rather help to protect it. In well-institutionalized<br />

systems the state, political organizations, and civil society both moderate<br />

political demands and aid in their expression, enhancing government’s<br />

capacity to respond through sound policy; economic processes take place<br />

within a framework <strong>of</strong> sound property rights, enforceable contracts, and<br />

open, verifiable transactions. A state that cannot guarantee property rights<br />

and basic liberties, collect taxes, enforce contracts, and provide legitimate<br />

channels for the expression <strong>of</strong> interests will be ineffective and unresponsive,<br />

and will invite private efforts to perform those functions, <strong>of</strong>ten by way <strong>of</strong><br />

corruption or violence. Where political organizations and civil society are<br />

weak or non-existent <strong>of</strong>ficials may wield power with impunity and conflicts<br />

in society are less likely to remain moderate. There will not necessarily be<br />

no growth in economic or political participation, but much <strong>of</strong> it may take<br />

place outside the <strong>of</strong>ficial institutional framework, obey few rules or boundaries,<br />

and serve only a powerful few. A 1997 pyramid scheme in Albania,<br />

for example, resulted in the loss <strong>of</strong> nearly a third <strong>of</strong> the nation’s savings and<br />

a violent upheaval (Percival, 1997; Jarvis,2000). On the political side,<br />

personal factions or even private armies can supplant parties and interest<br />

groups (O’Donnell, 2001), and mafiyas can become the means <strong>of</strong> contract<br />

enforcement (Varese, 2001). Particularly in a setting <strong>of</strong> weak institutions,<br />

unbalanced growth in political and economic opportunities allows dominant<br />

groups in one sphere to exploit the other.<br />

Searching for patterns<br />

The issue raised by these relationships is not just more versus less corruption.<br />

Rather, I argue that the state and trends <strong>of</strong> participation and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!