28.02.2015 Views

CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption

CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption

CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

106 <strong>Syndromes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corruption</strong><br />

business interests (Cheng and Chu, 2002: 32–33), and a short-lived<br />

alliance <strong>of</strong> students, newspapers, and opposition groups proved more<br />

than his regime could withstand in 1960. Presidents had to reward and<br />

restrain economic, administrative, and possibly military elites, and control<br />

political competitors. They would also have to attack the pervasive<br />

poverty creating a desperate and unstable social situation. Support from a<br />

strong network <strong>of</strong> supporting elites and the military was essential, and<br />

constructing that sort <strong>of</strong> network was not easy.<br />

Bringing power and money together<br />

‘‘Money politics’’ was the usual response to this dilemma, and in this as in<br />

so much else about Korea we must examine the era <strong>of</strong> Park Chung Hee<br />

(1917–1979). Park’s military career began in the Japanese army during<br />

the colonial years, and he rose to the rank <strong>of</strong> general in the Korean army<br />

after independence. He was a member <strong>of</strong> a junta that took power in 1961,<br />

and was elected President in 1963, 1967, and 1971 – the last time, after<br />

amending the Constitution to allow himself a third term. After declaring<br />

martial law in 1972 Park became more brutal; again the Constitution was<br />

amended to ratify and extend his powers. Park was assassinated in 1979<br />

by the head <strong>of</strong> the Korean Central Intelligence Agency. His governments<br />

were notable for their repressive techniques, but also laid the foundations<br />

for spectacular, chaebol-driven economic growth (Woo, 1991; Woo-<br />

Cumings, 1999a).<br />

Park’s power rested in part on force, but also on money (this discussion<br />

draws upon Moran, 1998: 166–173, and Kang, 2002a). His early dealings<br />

with business seemed adversarial; at one point top business figures<br />

accused <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iteering during the Rhee era were arrested (Woo, 1991:<br />

83–84) and paraded through the streets <strong>of</strong> Seoul (though promised<br />

punishments were never fully carried out). But Park quickly made<br />

favored businessmen and chaebols junior partners in the regime. In the<br />

early years the balance <strong>of</strong> power clearly favored Park, who favored<br />

chaebols on the basis <strong>of</strong> personal loyalty and success in producing growth<br />

(Cheng and Chu, 2002: 33). As Korea’s dash for growth accelerated,<br />

however, the chaebols became integral to a growing alliance between<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial power and family/corporate wealth. By the 1980s political<br />

and economic power and interests were virtually unified (Wedeman,<br />

1997a: 470; Steinberg, 2000: 216; Cheng and Chu, 2002: 33–34;<br />

Kang, 2002a: 97ff.).<br />

‘‘Money politics’’ was a powerful combination <strong>of</strong> political power and<br />

wealth that furthered both interests. It was also rather simple: chaebols<br />

made payments to political leaders, their parties, or their pet ‘‘foundations’’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!