28.02.2015 Views

CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption

CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption

CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

74 <strong>Syndromes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corruption</strong><br />

Germany: sharing the spoils<br />

Like the United States, Germany has a federal system, democratic politics,<br />

and a highly developed economy. It receives favorable corruption rankings,<br />

although it too has problems at local levels and is home to international<br />

businesses whose dealings have led to scandals. Its corruption differs from<br />

the American example to a degree because <strong>of</strong> the country’s party system,<br />

conceptions <strong>of</strong> democracy, and the role <strong>of</strong> the state in the economy. Still,<br />

Germany fits solidly within the Influence Market syndrome.<br />

Seibel (1997: 98–99) notes that the post-unification era has been<br />

marked by numerous small scandals, and that small-scale affairs <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

attract press and public interest while more important cases go nearly<br />

unnoticed. He attributes this pattern to long-term weaknesses in democratic<br />

values. Germany acquired a powerful modern bureaucracy and<br />

state before it liberalized its political system; democracy was eventually<br />

handed down from above rather than built from the grassroots. The<br />

German Rechtsstaat at its legal-administrative core has not been totally<br />

incorruptible, but citizens have long regarded it as relatively clean (Seibel,<br />

1997: 86, 90–92). More problems arise, however, in the Sozialstaat – that<br />

part <strong>of</strong> government that handles major revenues and delivers significant<br />

benefits. In 1999 The Economist (December 9) reported that over the<br />

previous year German police had investigated 2,400 cases <strong>of</strong> corruption,<br />

double the figure for 1996. <strong>Corruption</strong> is fairly extensive in local government<br />

construction contracting, for example (Seibel, 1997). A variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> interests contend for contracts and other benefits, and Germany’s<br />

decentralized political system <strong>of</strong>fers a wide range <strong>of</strong> access points at<br />

which parties and politicians can stand as middlemen.<br />

Three large, well-financed and well-organized major parties dominate<br />

German politics and link those interests to policy processes. From left to<br />

right they are the Social Democrats (SPD), the Free Democrats (FDP),<br />

and the Christian Democratic Union, known in Bavaria as the Christian<br />

Social Union (CDU/CSU). Also significant, though smaller and <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

fractious, is the Green Party. These parties provide a variety <strong>of</strong> connections:<br />

vertically, among levels <strong>of</strong> government; horizontally, among the<br />

Länder (states) and their subdivisions; and sectorally among contending<br />

social and economic interests. As in the US, Influence Markets also work<br />

to reduce political competition. Germany’s federal and parliamentary<br />

system encourages – indeed, necessitates – party coalitions at all levels.<br />

Major parties are rarely wholly out <strong>of</strong> power; even after defeats and<br />

scandals they and their leaders retain political leverage. Thus, leaders <strong>of</strong><br />

several parties are friends worth having. Moreover, despite generous<br />

public funding German election campaigns remain expensive business,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!