28.02.2015 Views

CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption

CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption

CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Participation, institutions, and syndromes <strong>of</strong> corruption 49<br />

Four groups <strong>of</strong> cases<br />

Our four categories <strong>of</strong> countries are suggestive, but do they have anything to<br />

do with reality? In this section I present statistical evidence suggesting that<br />

these groupings are sufficiently coherent to merit further study. Using<br />

country-level indicators <strong>of</strong> participation and institutional strength and<br />

a K-means cluster analysis, I identify four groups <strong>of</strong> countries that<br />

generally fit the categories and inhabit different sections <strong>of</strong> the corruptionand-development<br />

scatter plot in chapter 2. Other indicators also support<br />

the descriptions above. Statistics at this level cannot, by themselves,<br />

give details <strong>of</strong> corrupt processes within societies, but they allow us to select<br />

countries for the case-study chapters that will be the real test <strong>of</strong> the<br />

syndromes argument.<br />

Clusters <strong>of</strong> countries<br />

The results that follow are based upon a 168-country dataset I assembled<br />

using a variety <strong>of</strong> existing indicators <strong>of</strong> corruption, development, political<br />

and economic liberalization, and institutional quality. 1 The main statistical<br />

technique is K-means cluster analysis. It is a bit like factor analysis<br />

stood on end: where factor analysis begins with a correlation matrix and<br />

groups variables in terms <strong>of</strong> their fit on particular dimensions or factors,<br />

cluster analysis uses a set <strong>of</strong> variables to identify groups <strong>of</strong> cases. Those<br />

variables and the number <strong>of</strong> clusters sought are specified in advance by<br />

the user; thus, cluster analysis is simply a way <strong>of</strong> asking, ‘‘If we were to<br />

define N groups <strong>of</strong> countries using variables X, Y, and Z, what would<br />

those groups look like?’’ If the analysis were to show that statistically<br />

significant clusters could not be identified, or the clusters do not fit<br />

expected patterns, then we would need to rethink the expected relationships<br />

between participation and institutions. If, as is the case below, the<br />

results are consistent with expectations we will have shown only that our<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> cases are worth further study.<br />

The data Performing this analysis requires statistical indicators<br />

<strong>of</strong> participation and institutions. The time period to include affects not<br />

only the scope <strong>of</strong> development trends to be considered but also the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> societies we can include: data on most post-Soviet states, for<br />

example, have become available only relatively recently. Other sections <strong>of</strong><br />

the world, such as the Middle East, are less well represented in datasets<br />

1 The data and documentation are available at http://people.colgate.edu/mjohnston/<br />

personal.htm.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!