CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption
CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption
CORRUPTION Syndromes of Corruption
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Participation, institutions, and syndromes <strong>of</strong> corruption 49<br />
Four groups <strong>of</strong> cases<br />
Our four categories <strong>of</strong> countries are suggestive, but do they have anything to<br />
do with reality? In this section I present statistical evidence suggesting that<br />
these groupings are sufficiently coherent to merit further study. Using<br />
country-level indicators <strong>of</strong> participation and institutional strength and<br />
a K-means cluster analysis, I identify four groups <strong>of</strong> countries that<br />
generally fit the categories and inhabit different sections <strong>of</strong> the corruptionand-development<br />
scatter plot in chapter 2. Other indicators also support<br />
the descriptions above. Statistics at this level cannot, by themselves,<br />
give details <strong>of</strong> corrupt processes within societies, but they allow us to select<br />
countries for the case-study chapters that will be the real test <strong>of</strong> the<br />
syndromes argument.<br />
Clusters <strong>of</strong> countries<br />
The results that follow are based upon a 168-country dataset I assembled<br />
using a variety <strong>of</strong> existing indicators <strong>of</strong> corruption, development, political<br />
and economic liberalization, and institutional quality. 1 The main statistical<br />
technique is K-means cluster analysis. It is a bit like factor analysis<br />
stood on end: where factor analysis begins with a correlation matrix and<br />
groups variables in terms <strong>of</strong> their fit on particular dimensions or factors,<br />
cluster analysis uses a set <strong>of</strong> variables to identify groups <strong>of</strong> cases. Those<br />
variables and the number <strong>of</strong> clusters sought are specified in advance by<br />
the user; thus, cluster analysis is simply a way <strong>of</strong> asking, ‘‘If we were to<br />
define N groups <strong>of</strong> countries using variables X, Y, and Z, what would<br />
those groups look like?’’ If the analysis were to show that statistically<br />
significant clusters could not be identified, or the clusters do not fit<br />
expected patterns, then we would need to rethink the expected relationships<br />
between participation and institutions. If, as is the case below, the<br />
results are consistent with expectations we will have shown only that our<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> cases are worth further study.<br />
The data Performing this analysis requires statistical indicators<br />
<strong>of</strong> participation and institutions. The time period to include affects not<br />
only the scope <strong>of</strong> development trends to be considered but also the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> societies we can include: data on most post-Soviet states, for<br />
example, have become available only relatively recently. Other sections <strong>of</strong><br />
the world, such as the Middle East, are less well represented in datasets<br />
1 The data and documentation are available at http://people.colgate.edu/mjohnston/<br />
personal.htm.