14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

etween 0.1 to 5 l CH4/m 2*h, so that a mean value <strong>of</strong> 3 l CH4/m 2*h seems realistic.<br />

Even if one considers the potential influence <strong>of</strong> temperature, water content, and the<br />

varying gas qualities, it seems entirely probable, therefore, that such a layer would be<br />

able to oxidise a very high proportion <strong>of</strong> methane from the landfill gas emanating from<br />

MBT-treated wastes. Early trials suggest that a gas oxidation layer <strong>of</strong> about 120 cm<br />

combined with a gas distribution layer <strong>of</strong> 50 cm is suitable. 1228 Fugitive emissions <strong>of</strong><br />

methane are therefore minimal in this case.<br />

The positive effects on landfill behaviour <strong>of</strong> pre-treatment can only be realised if the<br />

landfill is adapted to the conditions presented by the waste. Landfill gas capture is<br />

not necessary (the low flux makes this technically infeasible, as was previously<br />

discussed in Section 63.2.1.2) and therefore no energy is generated from the landfill<br />

gas.<br />

We have effectively modelled two landfills. In the first, we keep the characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

the landfill the same as for general mixed waste. All that changes is that the gas<br />

generation from the treated waste is low. However, as part <strong>of</strong> a more general<br />

‘landfilling <strong>of</strong> waste’, we assume that in these situations, any gas emitted is treated<br />

as though it was coming from untreated waste.<br />

In the medium- to long-term, we would expect, particularly with the pre-treatment<br />

guidelines enforced, that landfill cells would be designed for primarily treated waste.<br />

In this case, we have modelled a second landfill kin which there is no gas capture in<br />

the conventional sense, where an active cover layer is depleted, and where, in line<br />

with the evidence cited above, 90% <strong>of</strong> the remaining methane emitted is oxidised by<br />

the landfill cover layer.<br />

63.2.1.6 Summary <strong>of</strong> Assumptions - Climate Change Impacts <strong>of</strong> Landfill<br />

Table 63-6 summarises our assumptions with regard to the management <strong>of</strong> landfill<br />

gas for untreated waste. These landfill gas capture assumptions result in total climate<br />

change impacts <strong>of</strong> €79.80 per tonne <strong>of</strong> untreated waste to landfill if the high external<br />

costs are assumed, or €63.06 if the lower damage costs are applied. The totals<br />

include emissions associated with energy used at the landfill (although these are<br />

insignificant in comparison to the direct emissions from the process).<br />

<strong>Management</strong> and Landfill Symposium. S Margherita di Pula, Caligari, Italy, 4-8 October 1999. pp 409-<br />

418.<br />

1228 Humer, M.; Lechner, P.: Design <strong>of</strong> a landfill cover layer to enhance methane oxidation - results <strong>of</strong> a<br />

two year field investigation. In: Christensen, T.H.; Cossu, R.; Stegmann, R. (Eds): Proc. Sardinia 2001,<br />

8. Int. <strong>Waste</strong> management and Landfill symposium, Vol. 2, 541-550, Cagliari, 2001.<br />

993<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!