14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

try to provide greater incentives for producers to design products with reuse/recycling<br />

in mind.<br />

The review by the United Nations University (2007) highlights the following key points<br />

regarding WEEE targets in Europe:<br />

404<br />

� The WEEE directive currently sets a minimum collection target target target <strong>of</strong> 4 kg per<br />

annum per inhabitant; however, this figure does not discriminate in favour <strong>of</strong><br />

those products that have the highest economic or environmental relevance;<br />

for example, the collection <strong>of</strong> refrigerators containing CFCs is more important<br />

for meeting environmental objectives so the targets should be set to reflect<br />

this importance. The rate <strong>of</strong> CFC extraction from old appliances and disposal<br />

without emission to air was reported in Recycle.co.uk as only 42 % in Germany<br />

compared to 91 % in Austria, stemming from a current lack <strong>of</strong> incentive to<br />

treat products in the most environmentally-friendly way if it requires further<br />

processing and added expense; 457<br />

� In addition, for some categories <strong>of</strong> WEEE it appears that the targets are easily<br />

being being met met by a number <strong>of</strong> European MS – for instance the current shredding<br />

and separation technologies for white goods typically lead to recycling rates in<br />

excess <strong>of</strong> those prescribed. It would have been appropriate, prior to the<br />

revision in the target, to ask the question whether the targets are high enough<br />

in those countries for which WEEE policy is now well developed, and where<br />

large (and growing) quantities <strong>of</strong> WEEE are found in the waste stream;<br />

� The final destination <strong>of</strong> the recycled/ recovered WEEE is not considered in the<br />

targets, and may thus result in discrimination against more environmentallypreferred<br />

options where they require more processing. For example, the use <strong>of</strong><br />

cleaned CRT glass for producing new CRTs has been shown to be more<br />

resource and energy efficient than using the glass as road filling material.<br />

However, WEEE policy regards both destinations as having equal footing in<br />

recycling percentages. Thus companies may favour road filling as the final<br />

destination as this requires less cleaning and separation;<br />

� Weight-based recycling targets may divert attention away from ‘prevention’ as<br />

a key policy outcome, by discouraging the design <strong>of</strong> future EEE to use less<br />

material and to reduce environmental damage in favour <strong>of</strong> meeting such<br />

targets.<br />

The recent proposed revision to the EU WEEE Directive includes a change in collection<br />

targets from 4 kg per annum per inhabitant to a 65% collection rate, calculated<br />

according to the average amount <strong>of</strong> EEE placed on the market in the two preceding<br />

years. This proposed target is more in line with the current Japanese system. In<br />

addition, in order to encourage the re-use <strong>of</strong> whole appliances, it is proposed that<br />

such re-use be included within the 65% target. The proposed revision also presents<br />

the possibility <strong>of</strong> setting a separate collection rate for cooling and freezing equipment<br />

457 S. Flanagan (2008) UK recyclers should not follow German WEEE model, Recycle.co.uk: Don’t Bin<br />

it, Recycle it, available at: http://www.recycle.co.uk/news/614000.html<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!