14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

146<br />

� £7-30 million where the avoided disposal routes are EfW; and<br />

� £15-48 million where the avoided disposal routes are landfill.<br />

In per household terms, therefore, one would expect inclusion <strong>of</strong> these benefits to<br />

increase the overall benefits associated with charging schemes by:<br />

� £0.51-£2.17 per household covered by the charging scheme where the<br />

avoided disposal route is EfW; and<br />

� £1.09 - £3.47 per household covered by the charging scheme where the<br />

avoided disposal route is landfill.<br />

Table 8-8: Monetised GHG-related Benefits from Charging in England, Recycling Only<br />

29/09/09<br />

Eunomia,<br />

Eunomia,<br />

EfW EfW<br />

ERM ERM Low,<br />

Low,<br />

EfW<br />

ERM ERM ERM High,<br />

High,<br />

EfW<br />

WRAP WRAP EfW<br />

EfW<br />

Avoided GHG Related Damages £15,086,496 £3,640,873 £4,814,992 £10,480,340<br />

Eunomia,<br />

Eunomia,<br />

Landfill<br />

Landfill<br />

ERM ERM Low,<br />

Low,<br />

Landfill<br />

Landfill<br />

ERM ERM ERM High,<br />

High,<br />

Landfill<br />

Landfill<br />

WRAP<br />

WRAP<br />

Landfill Landfill<br />

Landfill<br />

Avoided GHG Related Damages £24,373,133 £7,598,522 £19,430,617 £17,572,541<br />

Source: Hogg, D., Wilson, D., Gibbs, A., Astley, M., Papineschi, J. (2006) Modelling the Impact <strong>of</strong><br />

Household Charging for <strong>Waste</strong> in England, Final Report to Defra.<br />

It is clear that the potential for significant cost savings exists, and that whilst reducing<br />

costs, charging can also increase recycling performance. This in turn has the potential<br />

to generate significant reductions in greenhouse gases generated through improved<br />

materials management, That being said, the figures reproduced here must be treated<br />

as indicative, and sensitivity analysis undertaken for the Defra charging review shows<br />

how variation in the extent and pace <strong>of</strong> uptake can affect the extent <strong>of</strong> benefits to be<br />

derived at the national level from the implementation <strong>of</strong> household charging.<br />

8.6 Implementation Costs<br />

Some specific details <strong>of</strong> schemes’ costs are provided in the IWM charging review.<br />

Costs <strong>of</strong> implementing schemes depend upon the nature <strong>of</strong> the scheme itself (sackbased,<br />

frequency-based, weight-based, etc.). They also depend upon the nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

scheme already in place. This is particularly true with respect to billing. Key set up<br />

costs include:<br />

� Informing communities<br />

� Equipping containers as necessary;<br />

� Equipping vehicles as necessary;<br />

� Billing s<strong>of</strong>tware;<br />

� Arranging for sale <strong>of</strong> sacks as necessary<br />

� Introducing teams to check up on fly-tipping<br />

� Service lines to deal with start-up queries

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!