14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

712<br />

29/09/09<br />

There will be a certain amount <strong>of</strong> biodegradable municipal waste for which it<br />

is not feasible to achieve a sufficient level <strong>of</strong> segregated collection to satisfy<br />

the required landfill diversion targets. Accordingly, there will also be a need to<br />

collect this material as residual BMW and to provide treatment – either<br />

thermally or through some form <strong>of</strong> stabilisation – to reduce the biological<br />

activity to imperceptible levels and thereby ensure achievement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mandatory diversion targets.<br />

Regions / counties must decide how their <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Plans can<br />

address these requirements.<br />

Finally, it states:<br />

Each <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Plan should meet the targets <strong>of</strong> this Strategy,<br />

identifying the combination <strong>of</strong> collections and treatment types that suit local<br />

conditions and objectives. Each Plan should be reviewed on that basis.<br />

Each Annual Implementation Report to be prepared by local authorities on the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Plan, as required under Key Point<br />

13 <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong>: Taking Stock and Moving Forward, should record<br />

progress made in relation to the National Strategy on Biodegradable <strong>Waste</strong><br />

over the previous year. The format to be followed in the Annual<br />

Implementation Report will be specified in a Circular letter issued to all local<br />

authorities by the DoEHLG.<br />

What might not be clear to any <strong>of</strong> the planning regions is which targets really apply to<br />

them, and how should they implement the requirements to deliver the NBS? Do they<br />

all know, for example, how much BMW they should consider they were landfilling in<br />

1995? What is their ‘quota’ <strong>of</strong> the national allowance? If this is not known, how could<br />

the relevant calculations be performed? 874 Do the BMW projections imply ‘targets’?<br />

Who do any <strong>of</strong> the targets actually fall upon? If some local authorities do not collect<br />

any waste, is it reasonable to assume that they will take up the challenge <strong>of</strong> such<br />

targets seriously? Would it be appropriate to apply sanctions to them if they don’t,<br />

and if sanctions are not to be applied, how realistic is it to expect targets to be met?<br />

In short, whilst the document seeks to chart a way forward for Ireland to meet Landfill<br />

Directive targets, and whilst it contains some interesting targets in terms <strong>of</strong> home<br />

composting and source separation, the manner in which these should cascade down<br />

(to the regional level) is not always clear. The presumption appears to have been that<br />

the regions will implement these, even though the regions simply do not have the<br />

competence to deliver – in and <strong>of</strong> themselves – the outcomes.<br />

Interestingly, most <strong>of</strong> the Annual Implementation Reports for the Regional <strong>Waste</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> Plans make little or no reference to targets that the NBS suggests they<br />

should be implementing. Since there are very few Annual Implementation Reports<br />

which have been produced by the Regions, and since the NBS was completed only<br />

after most <strong>of</strong> the Regional <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Plans were updated, then it would<br />

874 The Draft NBS did actually apportion the national allowance to the regional level, which would have<br />

been a starting point for implementation at the regional level.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!