14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

it recycled, the requirement for companies to demonstrate obligations have been<br />

met, and the Repak scheme to reward collectors for collecting packaging waste. As<br />

far as we are aware, there has been no attempt to ‘apportion’ responsibility for the<br />

improvement to any one <strong>of</strong> the measures, let alone the Regulations themselves vis a<br />

vis other policy instruments. Several changes have been taking place simultaneously,<br />

so some <strong>of</strong> these will have contributed to progress made, notably, in our view, the<br />

increase in landfill gate fees, and the increasing buoyancy <strong>of</strong> markets for secondary<br />

materials in recent years.<br />

Although the legislation and efforts to date have been heavily focused on targets<br />

associated with recycling and recovery, it seems that there is a desire to shift<br />

emphasis in future towards packaging waste prevention. Initiatives thus far have<br />

centred around suasive measures, sometimes funded with public support. However,<br />

there would be merit in seeking to ensure that the RPS payments covered the whole<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong> the collection service to households and businesses, this itself<br />

acting as an incentive to encourage additional effort in waste prevention on the part<br />

<strong>of</strong> producers.<br />

However, even with such a measure in place, there would be merit in – and the<br />

forgoing suggests that several stakeholders would support – measures to instate,<br />

within legislation, stronger requirements to take efforts to prevent waste. To the<br />

extent that this might stretch to consumers as well as producers, one means through<br />

which to achieve this could be efforts to provide those businesses who are not<br />

producers with the training and technical guidance to complete internal audits and<br />

assessments and identify areas within their businesses where packaging can be<br />

minimised. The approach to producers ought to be somewhat different, and should be<br />

considered as part <strong>of</strong> the obligation placed upon producers. Hence, whilst producers<br />

should be required to take actions to reduce, and prevent, packaging waste, public<br />

support should be targeted at those who are not producers, with assistance given to<br />

help minimise the generation <strong>of</strong> packaging waste. Furthermore, households could be<br />

encouraged, though changes in legislation, to report examples <strong>of</strong> excess packaging,<br />

which would trigger inspections <strong>of</strong> these cases against the technical arguments in<br />

support <strong>of</strong> the packaging approach used.<br />

228<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!