14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

estrictions (see Annexes 52.0 to 55.0), so that the option <strong>of</strong> landfilling <strong>of</strong> waste<br />

without any form <strong>of</strong> treatment is progressively outlawed completely. The effectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the levy is, to some degree, being undermined by the reduction in the cost <strong>of</strong> the<br />

gate fee per tonne. This is even more significant when considered in real terms.<br />

Whilst gate fees appear to be declining in nominal terms in recent years, between<br />

2002 and 2008, the levy’s effectiveness was simply being eroded by inflation. Table<br />

11-3 details the landfill gate fee inclusive <strong>of</strong> the levy, and the proportion accounted<br />

for by the levy. It is apparent that the landfill levy <strong>of</strong> €15 per tonne as a percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

the landfill gate fee remained similar over this six year period. The fact that the levy<br />

has remained constant in nominal terms has meant that as pre-levy gate fees fall, so<br />

the total costs <strong>of</strong> landfilling are also declining, not just in nominal terms, but in real<br />

terms as well.<br />

Table 11-3: Percentage <strong>of</strong> Landfill Levy on Gate Fee<br />

Date Gate Fee (incl levy) Landfill Levy as % Total Gate Fee<br />

2002 €117.00 12.8%<br />

2005 €139.50 10.8%<br />

2006 €135.00 11.1%<br />

2007 €127.00 11.8%<br />

* Inclusive <strong>of</strong> €15 Landfill Levy<br />

The landfill levy was increased in July 2008 to further discourage the use <strong>of</strong> landfill as<br />

a treatment option. The aim <strong>of</strong> the increase was to reduce the quantity <strong>of</strong> waste being<br />

disposed <strong>of</strong> in landfill and to increase recovery and recycling rates (DoEHLG). This<br />

increase in the levy <strong>of</strong> €5 per tonne may not be effective in reducing the rate <strong>of</strong> waste<br />

being treated at landfill as the increase appears only to counter some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reductions in landfill gate fees that have been occurring in recent years.<br />

Given the above, then it seems likely that the effect <strong>of</strong> the levy will have been<br />

somewhat limited. To the extent that the costs <strong>of</strong> landfilling might have influenced<br />

behaviour, probably, the strongest influence will have been exerted in the period<br />

during which landfill gate fees rose in response to tighter regulatory controls.<br />

While the landfill tax is stated on invoices, for businesses that produce little waste,<br />

the landfill tax is minimal. For an <strong>of</strong>fice the average cost related to the landfill levy is<br />

<strong>of</strong> the order €2-3 per month. This gives very little incentive to change behaviour.<br />

11.6 Environmental Benefits<br />

The degree to which environmental benefits will have been delivered by the incentive<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> the levy is not clear. In this context, it is worth examining, for example, the<br />

likely incentive effects to recycle packaging coming from:<br />

190<br />

• Changes in landfill gate fees;<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!