14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hong Kong<br />

Industry surveying and interviews undertaken in Hong Kong on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

WMPs showed that the two main environmental benefits were thought to be:<br />

1. Increased on-site reuse <strong>of</strong> materials, and<br />

2. Increased waste reduction. 763<br />

However, there was no actual quantification <strong>of</strong> these benefits in the associated<br />

report.<br />

England<br />

Data available on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> WMPs comes from the results <strong>of</strong> research<br />

published by the Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA)<br />

which found that implementation <strong>of</strong> a SWMP in England results in 15% less waste<br />

onsite and 43% less waste to landfill. 764<br />

Singapore<br />

<strong>Waste</strong> statistics from 2007 show construction debris recycling rates in Singapore to<br />

be 98%. Clearly this achievement is mainly driven by the severe lack <strong>of</strong> landfill<br />

capacity but this was likely to have been influenced also by the requirement to<br />

prepare management plans and the mandated role <strong>of</strong> ECOs. Unfortunately<br />

quantifying the effect <strong>of</strong> ECOs in isolation is not possible.<br />

With few country specific examples it is clear that there is an overall lack <strong>of</strong> data in<br />

order to prove that the main outcomes listed above are actually taking place as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> WMPs.<br />

This issue regarding lack <strong>of</strong> data could in part be related to the lack <strong>of</strong> policy<br />

enforcement, which is discussed in Section 43.11. In addition, the data regarding<br />

construction and demolition waste has tended, by and large, to be <strong>of</strong> poor quality in<br />

many countries. The nature <strong>of</strong> the material is such that the re-use <strong>of</strong> material on-site,<br />

or the management <strong>of</strong> material across multiple sites, tends to make quality data<br />

gathering somewhat difficult. On the other hand, the plans themselves ought to be a<br />

means <strong>of</strong> achieving better quality data, albeit perhaps only for projects covered by the<br />

requirement.<br />

43.6 Implementation Costs<br />

The cost <strong>of</strong> implementation falls to the construction/demolition contractor who in turn<br />

will pass some <strong>of</strong> the cost onto their customer.<br />

763 V.W.Y. Tam (2007) On the Effectiveness in Implementing a <strong>Waste</strong>-<strong>Management</strong>-Plan Method in<br />

Construction.<br />

764 S. Coventry, B. Shorter & M. Kingsley (2001) Demonstrating <strong>Waste</strong> Minimisation Benefits in<br />

Construction, Construction Industry Research and Information Association Publication C536.<br />

637<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!