14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

552<br />

29/09/09<br />

http://www.greenalliance.org.uk/uploadedFiles/Publications/CPPWDenmark.<br />

pdf<br />

� D. Hogg, J. Barth, E. Favoino, M. Centemero, V. Caimi, F. Amlinger, W.<br />

Devliegher, W. Brinton and S. Antler (2002) Comparison <strong>of</strong> Compost Standards<br />

within the EU, North America and Australasia, report produced for WRAP.<br />

� Resource Recovery Forum (2006) The Czech Republic – Improvement in<br />

<strong>Waste</strong> Sorting, Second in EU.<br />

� G. W. Shaumburg and K. T. Doyle (1994) Wasting Resources to Reduce <strong>Waste</strong>:<br />

Recycling in New Jersey, Cato <strong>Policy</strong> Analysis, 202.<br />

34.5 Environmental Benefits<br />

The main environmental benefits from the mandatory requirement for separate<br />

collection and subsequent recycling/reuse <strong>of</strong> waste materials are likely to be:<br />

� Increased diversion <strong>of</strong> waste away from landfill or other residual waste<br />

treatments that might otherwise be required; and<br />

� The potential to re-process and consequently recycle the source-separated<br />

materials, saving on raw materials (and hence energy) in commercial and<br />

industrial processes.<br />

In most countries, it is difficult to attribute a specific increase in recycling and<br />

composting / digestion to this policy alone. This is because in most countries a policy<br />

<strong>of</strong> mandatory recycling <strong>of</strong> specific materials exists alongside other policies, including,<br />

for example, pay-by-use for households, and, as mentioned in this review, producer<br />

responsibility schemes implying provision <strong>of</strong> varying degrees <strong>of</strong> service on the part <strong>of</strong><br />

producers.<br />

To this end, the benefits <strong>of</strong> mandatory separate collection <strong>of</strong> recyclables would be<br />

assumed to be related to the benefits which studies attribute to recycling and<br />

composting / digestion more generally. For example, the Switzerland Federal<br />

Administration notes that the use <strong>of</strong> secondary aluminium instead <strong>of</strong> primary<br />

aluminium saves up to 95 % <strong>of</strong> the energy required to manufacture aluminium from<br />

raw materials. 652 In Austria, glass recycling in 2007 saved 155,000 tonnes <strong>of</strong> quartz<br />

sand, 50,000 tonnes <strong>of</strong> limestone and dolomite, 39,000 tonnes <strong>of</strong> soda, 212 million<br />

kWh <strong>of</strong> electrical energy and 5,650,000 m 3 <strong>of</strong> gas. 653 There is also the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

generating energy from waste (via processes such as anaerobic digestion, where both<br />

energy from biogas and a digestate product are generated).<br />

652 Federal Office for the Environment (2008) Guide to <strong>Waste</strong> [Online] (Updated 28 th February 2008).<br />

Available at: http://www.bafu.admin.ch/abfall/01472/index.html?lang=en [Accessed 10 th September<br />

2008].<br />

653 Federal Office for the Environment (2008) Guide to <strong>Waste</strong> [Online] (Updated 28 th February 2008).<br />

Available at: http://www.bafu.admin.ch/abfall/01472/index.html?lang=en [Accessed 10 th September<br />

2008].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!