14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60.0 Grant Funding<br />

60.1 Introduction<br />

The public sector is the main source <strong>of</strong> the grant funding, <strong>of</strong>fering financial assistance<br />

to organisations across the public and private sectors. The public sector sources the<br />

funds both from general taxation, and from specific ring-fenced pots <strong>of</strong> money,<br />

derived from particular taxes associated with potential environmentally detrimental<br />

activities, e.g. landfilling. The funds are then used to finance projects which <strong>of</strong>fset<br />

these detrimental activities, or support environmental policy goals.<br />

The OECD suggests:<br />

902<br />

29/09/09<br />

‘The golden rule <strong>of</strong> public funding suggests that governments should support<br />

only those investments that are economically efficient but not financially<br />

viable’. 1111<br />

By following the OECD’s advice, grants should fund projects which can prove that their<br />

reliance upon the funding is not long-term, and that they have the capacity to function<br />

sustainably, i.e. without the grant support, in the future. This generally makes it<br />

important to ensure that the applications for funding demonstrate an ability to stand<br />

on their own feet once grant support falls away. In some cases, revenues may be<br />

used to support specific activities on an ongoing basis, but in these cases, it is not<br />

clear what purpose the ear-marking purpose serves. If there are areas <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

which require ongoing support, presumably in the public sector, then it becomes<br />

unclear why the activity should not be supported through general taxation rather than<br />

ear-marking per se, though clearly, it can be argued that the two are equivalent.<br />

Having looked at the Irish case (Section 60.2), this report seeks to identify current<br />

international examples <strong>of</strong> grant funding (Section 60.4 to Section 60.12). Following<br />

this, the Irish case will be examined and recommendations will be made.<br />

60.2 Grant Funding in Ireland<br />

60.2.1 National Development Plan<br />

In Ireland the co-ordinating structure for the planning <strong>of</strong> government over a<br />

programme period is the National Development Plan (NDP). Historically, over past<br />

programme periods for the NDP, a significant feature <strong>of</strong> the NDP was the co-funding<br />

<strong>of</strong> some programmes and measures with income from the Irish exchequer along with<br />

EU funding. This has significantly reduced in the latest NDP period (2007-2013), in<br />

which an expected €3 billion from the EU Structural Funds was planned for within the<br />

€184 million expenditure planned for priority investment in the period.<br />

1111 OECD (2007) Handbook for Appraisal <strong>of</strong> Environmental Projects Financed from Public Funds,<br />

report to OECD by the Task Force for the Implementation <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Action Programme,<br />

Available: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/10/63/38786197.pdf

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!