14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

59.4 Levels <strong>of</strong> Achievement – Household / Municipal <strong>Waste</strong><br />

The level at which targets might be set might be influenced by whether they are to be<br />

made statutory or not:<br />

876<br />

1. Where targets are to be made statutory, what is deemed to be possible, with<br />

the emphasis placed upon being suitably ambitious. As far as possible, the<br />

target should be deemed likely to lead to beneficial outcomes;<br />

2. Where targets are to be non statutory, or where they are not backed by<br />

sanctions, there is reason to believe that they can be set at more ambitious<br />

levels, seeking to push boundaries. It is possible that such targets might not<br />

be met. The aim, however, should be to orient policies in order to meet such<br />

targets.<br />

Of course, the latter type <strong>of</strong> target risks being seen as ‘tokenism’, whilst the tendency<br />

with any target tends to be – perhaps for political reasons – to ensure that they can<br />

be met, sometimes, rather easily.<br />

One jurisdiction which has not been afraid to establish challenging targets is the<br />

Flemish region <strong>of</strong> Belgium. The Flemish Government’s household waste plan 1997-<br />

2001 set the following objectives (using 1995 as a baseline – see Table 59-1):<br />

• <strong>Waste</strong> reduction targets <strong>of</strong> 6 per cent by 2001 and <strong>of</strong> 10 per cent by 2006,<br />

later revised to 13% by 2007 (measured relative to trend);<br />

• Recycling rates <strong>of</strong> 52 per cent by 2001 and 55 per cent by 2006, rising to 70%<br />

thereafter; and<br />

• Each municipality was set the target <strong>of</strong> generating less than 150<br />

kg/inhabitant/year <strong>of</strong> residual waste by 2006.<br />

Earlier in the decade, eight <strong>of</strong> the 20 incinerators in existence in 1991 had been<br />

closed despite bans on landfilling in place since 1998 (see below).<br />

Table 59-1: Targets for Flemish Household <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

Year Year <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> prevention prevention prevention <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> recycling recycling +<br />

+<br />

composting<br />

composting<br />

29/09/09<br />

<strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> incineration incineration +<br />

+<br />

landfill<br />

landfill<br />

1995 0 % 34 % 66 %<br />

2001 6 % 52 % 48 %<br />

2006 10 % 55 % 45 %<br />

Source: OVAM<br />

In support <strong>of</strong> the recycling objectives, minimum requirements were established in law<br />

for waste collection by the municipalities in the Flemish region (by waste stream).<br />

They were:<br />

� Requirements to collect waste door-to-door, applicable for residual waste,<br />

bulky waste, organic waste, paper and cardboard, packaging waste;<br />

� Requirements for locating bottle banks and textile containers at a density <strong>of</strong><br />

1/1000 inhabitants or more (otherwise, the use <strong>of</strong> door-to-door collection);

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!