14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

terms <strong>of</strong> waste processing and disposal facilities and programmes for education and<br />

prevention.<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> this, those Local Authorities who have remained in the household waste<br />

collection system, have identified difficulties in recovering (what they feel are) the<br />

total costs incurred in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the PBU / separated household waste<br />

collection service at a price competitive with collection fees charged by other<br />

operators in the market.<br />

7.11 Complementary Policies<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> policies exist which compliment changes in the presentation <strong>of</strong> waste at<br />

household level. These policies are complementary because they aim to achieve<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the same objectives, including the minimisation <strong>of</strong> waste materials and<br />

household waste generated, and an increase in the amounts being recycled with the<br />

aim <strong>of</strong> materials and energy recovery. These are:<br />

114<br />

� The Landfill Levy (see Annex 11.0);<br />

� The Circular WPPR 17/08 (see Annex 33.0); and<br />

� The Packaging Regulations.<br />

7.12 Effect <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Policy</strong> on Pricing <strong>of</strong> Resources / Services<br />

The intention <strong>of</strong> PBU is to give incentives to households to use the waste<br />

management service in a more efficient manner. The degree to which PBU has<br />

achieved this objective depends upon the specifics <strong>of</strong> the charging mechanism used.<br />

Other things being equal, however, the aim is to ensure that, at the margin,<br />

households consider the quantity <strong>of</strong> waste they generate and how it is managed.<br />

Although recycling rates have increased, depending upon charging structures used,<br />

the system has the disadvantage <strong>of</strong> allowing households to believe that recycling is<br />

‘free’. 147 Some pricing structures – possibly most to date – have not highlighted the<br />

fact that collection and processing <strong>of</strong> all waste, whether black bin, green bin or brown<br />

bin, has associated expenses. The issue ought to be about setting the right price<br />

differentials. Furthermore, <strong>of</strong>fering a ‘free’ recycling service and a relatively high<br />

marginal charge on refuse may have the effect <strong>of</strong> increasing the level <strong>of</strong><br />

contamination <strong>of</strong> the recycling containers if, at the margin, the incentive is high, and<br />

the potential for quality checks is low (as it undoubtedly is with bin-based recycling<br />

schemes).<br />

In addition some Local Authorities have been dissatisfied with the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

transparency in the charging systems used by private waste collectors within their<br />

functional area. The local authority state that itemised bills are not issued to<br />

householders by collectors (at least in the case <strong>of</strong> fixed fee, tag based or potentially<br />

volume based charging) prompting the concern that the reduced waste to landfill is<br />

147 A. O Callaghan-Platt and A. Davies (2007) A Nationwide <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pay-By-Use Domestic <strong>Waste</strong><br />

Charges in Ireland, Interim Report to the EPA.<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!