14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

112<br />

29/09/09<br />

“However, over one-quarter disagree and this may reflect the fact that they<br />

are unfamiliar with the waiver system or that they do not think that the<br />

waivers adequately meet the needs <strong>of</strong> certain households. They may also feel<br />

that some people generate waste through no fault <strong>of</strong> their own and yet have to<br />

pay. There is also the issue that tax relief on the waste charge is granted to<br />

compliant customers, but those that are not earning sufficient money to be in<br />

the tax net cannot avail <strong>of</strong> the relief.”<br />

The most negative attitude was reflected by the 47% <strong>of</strong> respondents who felt that it<br />

had increased the mess and bother <strong>of</strong> waste disposal. This might reflect a lack <strong>of</strong> a<br />

wide scope <strong>of</strong> recycling service, with only glass recycling considered to be convenient<br />

in these areas.<br />

Table 7-1: Perceptions <strong>of</strong> the New Pay-by-weight Scheme<br />

Possible views about the new pay-byweight<br />

scheme<br />

Agree<br />

Neither agree nor<br />

disagree<br />

Disagree<br />

New pay-by-weight scheme is fair 64% 8% 28%<br />

New scheme encourages households to<br />

reduce waste<br />

93% 4% 3%<br />

Makes people more aware <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

waste disposal<br />

90% 4% 5%<br />

Better than the old flat annual charge 56% 13% 31%<br />

Better than paying through an increase<br />

in income tax<br />

78% 15% 8%<br />

Scheme has increased mess and bother<br />

<strong>of</strong> waste disposal<br />

47% 11% 42%<br />

Feel I have enough information on<br />

recycling and other methods<br />

71% 3% 26%<br />

Source: Sue Scott and Dorothy Watson (2006) Introduction <strong>of</strong> Weight-Based Charges for Domestic<br />

Solid <strong>Waste</strong> Disposal, Final Report Prepared for the EPA by the Economic and Social Research<br />

Institute, (2000-DS-6-M1).<br />

7.9 Effects on Technical Change / Innovation<br />

PBU has resulted in new waste collection technologies. Under the pay by weight<br />

scheme each residual waste collection vehicle is installed with weighing equipment<br />

designed to weigh wheeled bins as they are lifted into the truck. Every bin is fitted<br />

with a microchip in the underside <strong>of</strong> the lip <strong>of</strong> the bin. Each chip has the individual<br />

householder’s details scanned onto it. When a bin is emptied a microchip reader on<br />

the back <strong>of</strong> the truck sends the information to the on board computer. The<br />

information gathered is then downloaded to an invoicing system and this is how<br />

householders can then be billed in accordance with the weight <strong>of</strong> waste they produce<br />

for disposal.<br />

<strong>Waste</strong> collection vehicles with separated compartments within the trucks to allow for<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> both residual black bin waste and dry recyclables have been developed.<br />

This allows the collection <strong>of</strong> both types <strong>of</strong> materials in the same route shift coverage<br />

on the same day using the same staffing (administrative) resource to achieve the<br />

objective. This development has occurred in response to the alternative<br />

administrative cost option <strong>of</strong> collecting the material in separate trucks, on separate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!