14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

stream (estimated at 8% in the <strong>Waste</strong> Characterisation report carried out on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />

the EPA. 854)<br />

Finally, it is important to comment on why the commercial and household captures <strong>of</strong><br />

dry recyclables are so much higher than the capture <strong>of</strong> organics. In principle, the<br />

economics <strong>of</strong> both both the source separation <strong>of</strong> dry recyclables, and the collection and<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> source segregated organic materials, are driven by the avoided costs <strong>of</strong><br />

disposal. In principle, therefore, the two might be expected to develop in parallel.<br />

Clearly, this has not happened.<br />

One reason for this is that the separate collection <strong>of</strong> biowaste presumes the existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> a treatment facility which is capable <strong>of</strong> handling the materials as collected by the<br />

collecting entity. Not only does this require a degree <strong>of</strong> certainty in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> travel in respect <strong>of</strong> separate collection <strong>of</strong> biowaste, but it also presumes<br />

that the approach to licensing facilities is not unduly onerous, and facilitates<br />

investment by developers <strong>of</strong> such facilities. It can be argued that the absence <strong>of</strong> any<br />

certainty in terms <strong>of</strong> the direction <strong>of</strong> travel <strong>of</strong> policy – at least until recently – has<br />

made it difficult to justify investments in both additional collection infrastructure, and<br />

the treatment <strong>of</strong> collected materials. 855 The matter <strong>of</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> organic waste has<br />

been further hindered by a lack <strong>of</strong> clarity over the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Animal Byproducts<br />

Regulation in Ireland, though this now shows signs <strong>of</strong> being resolved (see<br />

Annex 37.0).<br />

51.2.1 Potential Treatment Capacity for Organic <strong>Waste</strong>s from the Municipal<br />

Stream<br />

A report by InterTradeIreland suggests that on the island <strong>of</strong> Ireland (i.e. including<br />

Northern Ireland), capacity at licensed and permitted sites which have the capability<br />

for treating animal by-products is <strong>of</strong> the order 718,000 tonnes, <strong>of</strong> which, facilities <strong>of</strong><br />

capacity around 313,000 tonnes are currently operational. These facilities have<br />

around 135,000 tonnes <strong>of</strong> spare capacity.<br />

It is estimated that <strong>of</strong> the unbuilt, but licensed / permitted capacity, around 235,000<br />

tonnes could be built by early 2010. In addition, there are sites in the planning<br />

process at present. 856<br />

The picture is not completely clear from this report regarding the situation in the<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> Ireland. Our own brief attempt to generate relevant data suggests that<br />

currently operational capacity for facilities capable <strong>of</strong> treating animal by-products is <strong>of</strong><br />

the order 86,000 tonnes, but that there is ‘latent’ capacity which may be <strong>of</strong> the order<br />

854 RPS (2009) Municipal <strong>Waste</strong> Characterisation Surveys 2008, Final Report for the EPA, March<br />

2009.<br />

855 This review clearly has not helped add to the certainty, and one aim <strong>of</strong> the review must be to give<br />

greater certainty to investors regarding the nature <strong>of</strong> alternatives to landfill required, and regarding the<br />

flow <strong>of</strong> materials into non-landfill facilities without at the same time undermining the desirability <strong>of</strong><br />

delivering on high recycling rates.<br />

856 InterTradeIreland (2009) Market Report on the Composting and Anaerobic Digestion Sectors,<br />

Report for Cre and WRAP, May 2009.<br />

702<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!