14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FOST-Plus reports the following collection costs for separately collected waste<br />

streams: 205<br />

181<br />

� Glass: €1.51/capita;<br />

� Paper-cardboard: €1.01/capita;<br />

� PMD (collection and sorting): €5.61/capita; 206<br />

� Communication: €0.36/capita;<br />

� Other costs: €0.65/capita.<br />

With regard to these waste streams, FOST-Plus pays the intermunicipal organisations<br />

the full cost <strong>of</strong> collection and sorting, in the frame <strong>of</strong> a EPR mechanism for packaging<br />

waste (see Annex 15.0).<br />

10.8 Effects on Technical Change / Innovation<br />

The implementation <strong>of</strong> DIFTAR systems required some technical changes to waste<br />

collection operations. The first generation <strong>of</strong> DIFTAR systems were sack- or tag-based<br />

(the constraint being on the volume <strong>of</strong> material generated), the charge being levied<br />

through the sale <strong>of</strong> specific sacks, or <strong>of</strong> identifying stickers. These systems remain the<br />

most commonly applied approach.<br />

A desire for more sophisticated systems which better convey the incentive to reduce<br />

the weight <strong>of</strong> waste produced has led to development <strong>of</strong> pay by weight DIFTAR<br />

systems. In this case chipped bins are weighed when loaded onto collection trucks.<br />

Additionally, in the more urban context, underground containers with limited capacity<br />

loading and automated identification systems have been developed (much as with<br />

the German sluice gate systems). 207<br />

DIFTAR may be said to have increased the number <strong>of</strong> segregated waste streams and<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> material recycled. It cannot, however, be seen as the only reason for the<br />

growth and the consolidation in this sector in the last decade (see also Section 10.6).<br />

It may also be noted that municipal waste remains under 10% <strong>of</strong> the total quantity <strong>of</strong><br />

waste generated in Flanders.<br />

10.9 Social and Distributional Consequences<br />

DIFTAR could affect social inequality where more wealthy households are able to<br />

afford to produce more mixed waste than households on the edge <strong>of</strong> poverty even<br />

when sorting a large amount <strong>of</strong> their waste.<br />

205 FOST-Plus (2008) Annual Report 2007 (note FOST-Plus is the entity responsible for household<br />

packaging waste recycling in Belgium – see Appendix 15.0).<br />

206 Note PMD = plastic, metals and drinks containers.<br />

207 These systems are dewscribed in the Luxembourg case in D. Hogg (ed.) (2002) Financing and<br />

Incentive Scheme for Municipal <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong>: Case Studies, Final Report to DG Environment<br />

the European Commission.<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!