14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

710<br />

• 2013 required 1,729,585<br />

• 2016 required 1,817,262<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> what this might mean and for whom, the report states:<br />

29/09/09<br />

The assessment <strong>of</strong> capacity requirements, as indicated in Table 3.2, for<br />

alternative treatment methods to cater for the diversion <strong>of</strong> biodegradable<br />

municipal waste in the years 2010, 2013 and 2016 represents the national<br />

position. The various waste management planning regions / counties should<br />

assess their individual needs for BMW management. This approach will<br />

enable the gap or ‘indicative target diversion capacity’ for each region /<br />

county to be outlined.<br />

Targets were set for recycling <strong>of</strong> municipal waste paper and cardboard. These are set<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> the capture <strong>of</strong> paper and cardboard:<br />

� 45% for households and 61% for commerce in 2010, corresponding to 55% <strong>of</strong><br />

overall paper / cardboard generation within BMW;<br />

� 55% for households and 71% for commerce in 2013, corresponding to 65% <strong>of</strong><br />

overall paper / cardboard generation within BMW; and<br />

� 60% for households and 73% for commerce in 2016, corresponding to 67% <strong>of</strong><br />

overall paper / cardboard generation within BMW.<br />

Targets were set for home composting, the aim being to ensure this takes place at<br />

20% <strong>of</strong> urban households and 55% <strong>of</strong> rural households – equivalent to some 35% <strong>of</strong><br />

all households - by 2010. It was anticipated that potential yield from this would be<br />

between 10% to 12% <strong>of</strong> available organic waste in the years 2010 and 2016.<br />

For organic waste, the targets were:<br />

� 40% coverage for households and 60% coverage for commerce in 2010 at an<br />

estimated average yield <strong>of</strong> 45% to 60% respectively, corresponding to 25% <strong>of</strong><br />

overall organic waste generation within BMW;<br />

� 45% coverage for households and 70% coverage for commerce in 2013 at an<br />

estimated average yield <strong>of</strong> 50% to 65% respectively, corresponding to 33% <strong>of</strong><br />

overall organic waste generation within BMW; and<br />

� 50% coverage for households and 70% coverage for commerce in 2016 at an<br />

estimated average yield <strong>of</strong> 55% to 70% respectively, corresponding to 36% <strong>of</strong><br />

overall organic waste generation within BMW.<br />

The above targets were assumed, in the NBS, to lead to a requirement for residual<br />

BMW treatment capacity as follows:<br />

� an estimated 308,904 tonnes <strong>of</strong> residual waste treatment will be necessary in<br />

2010;<br />

� an estimated 438,190 tonnes <strong>of</strong> residual waste treatment will be necessary in<br />

2013; and<br />

� an estimated 499,762 tonnes <strong>of</strong> residual waste treatment will be necessary in<br />

2016.<br />

These figures are couched as ‘targets’, and extraordinarily precise ones as that.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!