14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As noted above, there are differences in the cost <strong>of</strong> collecting packaging from<br />

households and from commerce and industry. As packaging recycling increases,<br />

proportionately more material is likely to be required to be captured from households.<br />

The EEA report notes: 247<br />

227<br />

“As increasing volumes <strong>of</strong> household waste, which are more expensive to<br />

collect than commercial waste, are collected as a result <strong>of</strong> the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> local authority waste management plans, it is anticipated that compliance<br />

costs will further increase in the years ahead.”<br />

Reflecting a similar perspective, in their National <strong>Waste</strong> Report 2006 the EPA notes<br />

that with regard to packaging waste: 248<br />

“Packaging waste recycling is strong and continues to grow. Addressing the<br />

growth in the use <strong>of</strong> packaging, as illustrated by the growth in packaging<br />

waste, should now become a new priority for Repak, as opposed to finding<br />

new, and more expensive, sources <strong>of</strong> packaging waste to recycle”<br />

12.14 Evasion and Enforcement<br />

Repak estimates that the number <strong>of</strong> Non Compliers, was about 1,050 in 2001,<br />

declining to an estimated 700 in 2004 and around 150 in 2008. It has been<br />

suggested that some <strong>of</strong> this can be attributed to stepped-up enforcement activity by<br />

the local authorities. According to Repak, 48 convictions have been secured by 8<br />

local authorities over a ten year period, with the maximum fine being €15,000. 249<br />

However, the record <strong>of</strong> enforcement does not appear to be an especially strong one. A<br />

clear issue for the scheme is that local authorities might not have sufficient<br />

resources, or incentives, to ensure compliance. In particular, if enforcement were to<br />

bring more companies within the compliance scheme fold, the levies required from<br />

each scheme member in order to provide revenue for RPS payments and other<br />

activities would decline. There is an argument, therefore, for removing the de minimis<br />

threshold altogether in the context <strong>of</strong> a tightened compliance regime. It might also be<br />

interesting for local authorities to be incentivised to enforce the scheme by, for<br />

example, designing this such that those who are not complying with the Regulations<br />

are required to pay fines to the local authorities themselves. This would require<br />

provision to be made for that purpose.<br />

12.15 Lessons Learned<br />

The Packaging Regulations have most likely had a positive effect in increasing the<br />

recycling <strong>of</strong> packaging in Ireland through the application and use <strong>of</strong> various<br />

measures, including obligations on producers to segregate packaging waste and have<br />

247 EEA (2005) Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Packaging <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Systems in Selected Countries: An EEA<br />

Pilot Study, EEA Report No 03/2005.<br />

248 EPA (2007) National <strong>Waste</strong> Report 2006, Wexford: EPA.<br />

249 Information from Repak presentation to Eunomia, February 2009.<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!