14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Some general observations are as follows:<br />

882<br />

� The highest recycling rates for household waste achieved over an area <strong>of</strong> a<br />

given size (in terms <strong>of</strong> household numbers) tends to decline as the number <strong>of</strong><br />

households covered increases (so in the best Italian regions, recycling rates<br />

are moving towards 60%, whilst at the local level, they may exceed 70%,<br />

though at the national level, rates are now around 50%). This is because<br />

recycling rates are calculated as averages. The larger the number <strong>of</strong><br />

households covered, the lower the maximum rate for the area <strong>of</strong> that size<br />

becomes. This is not necessarily due to ‘limits’. It may equally relate to the<br />

(limited) extent <strong>of</strong> diffusion <strong>of</strong> high performance systems across a region;<br />

� Even so, household recycling rates <strong>of</strong> 70% are achieved in regions with a<br />

greater number <strong>of</strong> households than are present in the whole <strong>of</strong> Ireland. For<br />

example, Flanders, a region <strong>of</strong> 6 million inhabitants in 308 municipalities<br />

(grouped in 25 intermunicipal waste management associations) achieved a<br />

rate for separate collection <strong>of</strong> 71% in 2005. 1102<br />

� The rates <strong>of</strong> recycling <strong>of</strong> municipal waste for the leading EU Member States –<br />

these are Austria, Germany, Belgium, Netherlands and Italy – are, according to<br />

most recent data, recycling 64%, 62%, 60%, 50% and 60%, respectively, <strong>of</strong><br />

municipal waste according to preliminary figures produced from Eurostat data<br />

for 2007. The figures for Austria, Germany and Belgium are country estimates,<br />

with the figures for 2006 suggesting rates <strong>of</strong> 67%, 62% and 58%<br />

respectively; 1103<br />

� Recycling rates tend to be highest in rural and suburban areas. In this respect,<br />

one could argue that Ireland ought to be capable <strong>of</strong> achieving higher, not<br />

lower, rates <strong>of</strong> recycling, though in practice, much depends upon how the<br />

matter is approached. In some rural regions <strong>of</strong> Austria, such as Upper Austria,<br />

the collection <strong>of</strong> recyclables is not so heavily focused on collection from the<br />

kerbside / doorstep, yet the recycling rate still reaches 70% (see Box 2). This<br />

experience highlights how adapting the collection <strong>of</strong> materials to specific<br />

circumstances can enable the achievement <strong>of</strong> high recycling rates in rural<br />

areas in an efficient manner. Other regions <strong>of</strong> Austria achieve high recycling<br />

rates in areas <strong>of</strong> relatively low population density.<br />

This brief review is at least suggestive <strong>of</strong> what might be achieved in future. If recycling<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> 70% or so are becoming more common locally, and if the trend is upwards, it<br />

would seem to make sense to consider targeting those sorts <strong>of</strong> rates in a country<br />

where the waste management system is ‘in development’ at some stage in the future.<br />

Similarly, if Ireland is to constrain household waste generation, residual waste targets<br />

should reflect such rates in the context <strong>of</strong> relatively static waste arisings.<br />

1102 OVAM (u.d.) Activiteitenoverzicht 2006, Mechelen: OVAM.<br />

1103 This data has been gathered<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!