14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.0 Competition in the Market for <strong>Waste</strong> Collection<br />

Some Irish local authorities moved away from providing household waste<br />

management services in the mid 1990’s following the introduction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Waste</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> Act 1996. The market for waste services then opened for competition<br />

with the local authorities effectively determining who could compete in the collection<br />

market (and through providing which service) through their role in issuing waste<br />

collection permits. The OECD discusses the appropriate approach to competition. 60 It<br />

suggests there are two categories <strong>of</strong> competition which could be considered in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> the Irish market:<br />

44<br />

1) Competition in the market; and<br />

2) Competition for the market.<br />

3.1 Definitions<br />

3.1.1 Competition in the Market<br />

This can be viewed as a standard free market approach to service provision. The ideal<br />

free market approach consists <strong>of</strong> removing all trade barriers thus letting the market<br />

and competitors within the market adjust to the equilibrium, or most efficient, level <strong>of</strong><br />

participation. To develop the aims <strong>of</strong> central government regarding waste, a certain<br />

level <strong>of</strong> regulation will exist in the market. Householders choose to contract<br />

individually with a waste collection company (or not, as the case may be).<br />

There has been, in the context <strong>of</strong> the existing situation in Ireland some discussion as<br />

to the need, or otherwise, for a regulator in the market. 61<br />

3.1.2 Competition for the Market<br />

This relates to competition for a contract to be responsible for waste management for<br />

a specific geographic region. This occurs through periodic tendering processes, in<br />

which companies bid for time-limited monopolies over service provision. Through the<br />

tendering process, costs <strong>of</strong> the underlying service are revealed. Key to obtaining value<br />

for money is the design <strong>of</strong> the tendering process itself. There is a considerable body<br />

<strong>of</strong> literature regarding the economics <strong>of</strong> contracts, and the likely behaviour <strong>of</strong><br />

participants in bidding situations. 62 In practice, there is also a variety <strong>of</strong> experience<br />

with tendering processes.<br />

60 OECD (2000) Competition in Local Services: Solid <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong>, DAFFE/CLP(2000)13<br />

61 DoEHLG (2006) Regulation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Sector: Consultation Paper,<br />

http://www.environ.ie/en/Publications/Environment/<strong>Waste</strong>/<strong>Waste</strong><strong>Management</strong>/FileDownLoad,1446,<br />

en.pdf<br />

62 See, for example, J-J. Lafont (1989) The Economics <strong>of</strong> Uncertainty and Information, Cambridge: MIT<br />

Press; J-J. Lafont and J. Tirole (1993) A Theory <strong>of</strong> Incentives in Procurement and Regulation,<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!