14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

experiences with the nationwide return system. Around 70 % however were not<br />

satisfied with the way in which the retail markets were applying the system.<br />

According to an inquiry by the Bielefelder market research institute on behalf <strong>of</strong> the<br />

working group packaging and environment, the new deposit regulation, which became<br />

effective on 1 st <strong>of</strong> October 2003, is a failure. The institute had asked 600 households<br />

via telephone between 2 nd and 6 th <strong>of</strong> October. According to the study 78 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />

German households are <strong>of</strong> the opinion that the new system <strong>of</strong> one-way packaging did<br />

not improve the situation in relation to the pre-existing system. 52 % pronounced that<br />

they were in favour <strong>of</strong> an abolishment <strong>of</strong> the deposit obligation. 26 % <strong>of</strong> respondents<br />

criticised some shops for refusing to take back packaging or to pay back the deposit.<br />

36% feel the return <strong>of</strong> empty cans and bottles is annoying. 28 % complained about<br />

delays at the till. 51% buy fewer or no cans, or one-way packages, because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

deposits. 385<br />

Over several years the German Council <strong>of</strong> Environmental Advisors<br />

(“Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen, SRU”) reached the conclusion that the<br />

deposit system for one-way containers should be withdrawn. The SRU regard the<br />

deposit as ecologically ineffective and economically inefficient. 386 Under the current<br />

legal climate, after the amendment <strong>of</strong> the packaging ordinance, the SRU sees further<br />

possibilities to encourage reusable systems to meet environmental and economic<br />

objectives. 387<br />

The facts show that in terms <strong>of</strong> prevention, the major impact has been a material<br />

switch from cans to (reusable) glass for beer. Also, probably facilitated by parallel<br />

technological change, there has been a change to PET bottles, which now account for<br />

76% <strong>of</strong> the drinks container market, which is split into 63% one-way and 13%<br />

reusable.<br />

The key success and failure factors <strong>of</strong> the policy for one-way deposits are:<br />

348<br />

� Standardised deposit regulation (no differentiation by content <strong>of</strong> beverage);<br />

� A standardised level <strong>of</strong> deposit (25 euro cents); and<br />

� A nationwide deposit-return system.<br />

No variation in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Ordinance across Germany was identified.<br />

17.12 Prerequisites for Introduction<br />

These are the essential elements that are required for this particular policy to be<br />

introduced:<br />

� Political willingness;<br />

385 EUWID, No. 43 from October 2003, p.8.<br />

386 Council <strong>of</strong> Environmental Advisors (SRU), Environmental Report 2002 (“Umweltgutachten”), p. 411.<br />

387 SRU, Environmental Report 2004, p. 350.<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!