14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

64.0 Costs <strong>of</strong> Household <strong>Waste</strong> Collection<br />

64.1 Background – The <strong>Waste</strong> Collection Market Operating in<br />

Ireland<br />

The chargeable waste collection services operated in Ireland are practically unique.<br />

The collection market is effectively an open one in which private companies and local<br />

authorities alike are competing against one another. The <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Act<br />

(1996) stipulates that all local authorities in Ireland are obliged to collect or arrange<br />

for the collection <strong>of</strong> domestic waste in their area. However, as discussed in the policy<br />

review annex, though this means that local authorities are responsible for<br />

administering the permits to collect waste, there is no control on individual<br />

households as to how they choose to avail themselves (or not) <strong>of</strong> the services <strong>of</strong>fered,<br />

and only limited control (though the collection permits) on how the waste is<br />

subsequently managed. 1276<br />

A consequence <strong>of</strong> the free market for waste collection is that collection routing<br />

(referred to as round design) probably suffers inefficiencies due to low customer<br />

densities. In addition, spatial logistics may be less than optimal with regard to cost in<br />

that average distances (and hence, other things being equal, journey times) from<br />

depots to rounds might be expected to be longer where different collection operators<br />

are operating in overlapping territories.<br />

Organised competition for providing collection services is certainly to be encouraged<br />

as it forces contractors to optimise for cost efficient services. In the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

instances around Europe (and worldwide), however, the competition is conducted<br />

through a tendering process to win a contract for comprehensive collection from all<br />

households. In some cases, local authorities themselves provide the service.<br />

However, the situation where the competition remains open on a day by day basis<br />

leads to multiple companies being operational in an area, even though they may only<br />

have a small number <strong>of</strong> customers in any one street. Collection costs per household<br />

naturally suffer due to the impact that this has on the efficiency <strong>of</strong> utilisation <strong>of</strong> staff<br />

and vehicles.<br />

Using an analogy to the electricity supply market, rather than customers all using the<br />

one set <strong>of</strong> power lines, it is much like a number <strong>of</strong> different companies all providing<br />

their own power lines in every street, with households selecting their cable <strong>of</strong> choice.<br />

The total costs <strong>of</strong> providing the service are greatly increased, and the efficiency in the<br />

way in which the service is provided is reduced. In situations where such services are<br />

provided in a genuinely competitive market, ironically, the costs may rise to users<br />

even as the margins to operators decline. In short, nobody wins.<br />

1276 The collection permit system does appear to be being deployed with increased vigour by the<br />

relevant authorities so that this level <strong>of</strong> control may be increasing.<br />

1033<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!