14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

disputes (and the time taken to resolve them) highlight the fact that the law is<br />

insufficiently clear.<br />

In this context, we suggest that there is a need to strengthen the demarcation <strong>of</strong> local<br />

authority roles in respect <strong>of</strong> different waste streams. One possible reason that<br />

tensions arise in the collection market is that no one seems entirely sure (until the<br />

courts decide) who has the right to compete in which market. In addition, the local<br />

authorities’ power to direct waste appears to be being used to direct commercial<br />

waste collected by commercial collectors into facilities in which the local authorities<br />

may have a significant commercial interest. We suggest that the market needs to be<br />

clearly delineated as follows:<br />

70<br />

1. Local authorities will become responsible for (directly, or through tendering)<br />

household waste collection. They will also have responsibility for, and would<br />

choose whether to procure facilities, or capacity at existing facilities, for the<br />

treatment and disposal <strong>of</strong> the waste so collected. In other words, they would<br />

be expected to direct household waste to specific facilities. The issue<br />

regarding waivers for low-income households would effectively become one for<br />

local authorities to address in the context <strong>of</strong> their role in organising service<br />

delivery;<br />

2. A very different situation would prevail in respect <strong>of</strong> commercial waste<br />

collection. The local authority would have no powers <strong>of</strong> direction over this<br />

waste. A collection market would remain for commercial and industrial waste.<br />

The market, suitably configured (with a residual waste levy in place, alongside<br />

the EPA’s Guidance on Pre-treatment, and requirements to sort waste on the<br />

part <strong>of</strong> businesses) would be left to determine how this waste was treated. The<br />

market would also be expected to provide the relevant treatment and disposal<br />

infrastructure for the collected material.<br />

At least two areas escape this seemingly neat division:<br />

29/09/09<br />

a) Both local authorities and the private sector operate landfills. The two<br />

compete, and would do so for both household and commercial waste.<br />

They will continue to do so in future, so the issue – real or perceived –<br />

<strong>of</strong> how facilities are consented retains significance;<br />

b) Both local authorities and the private sector collect commercial waste.<br />

The two would, where the local authority was active in collection,<br />

compete in this market. There are, in this case, some issues worthy <strong>of</strong><br />

consideration. The OECD notes: 105<br />

Local authorities are not subject to value-added tax (VAT) for<br />

their waste management services as in the case for the private<br />

sector. While this is not an issue at the household level, it is an<br />

issue for commercial customers where service users cannot<br />

claim back VAT. This allows local authorities to <strong>of</strong>fer their<br />

105 OECD (2008) Ireland: Toward an Integrated Public Service, Paris: OECD, available at:<br />

http://www.oecd.org/document/31/0,3343,en_2649_33735_40529119_1_1_1_1,00.html

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!