14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The above line <strong>of</strong> thinking led the County to believe that it could readily explain<br />

around 35% <strong>of</strong> the drop in residual waste, but that the remaining reduction<br />

demanded closer examination. The County considered the possibilities for legitimate<br />

and illegitimate changes in behaviour which could explain the ‘unexplained’ reduction<br />

in residual waste. As regards legitimate routes, the following were considered:<br />

1. A reduction in the amount <strong>of</strong> inert building / DIY waste generated;<br />

2. A change in the use <strong>of</strong> nappies from disposables to re-usables. Statistics and<br />

compositional analysis suggest a reduction from 9.4kg/average-inhabitant before<br />

the scheme to 7kg/average-inhabitant after implementation; and<br />

3. Consumer choices. Some evidence suggests that consumers are changing<br />

consumption habits to reduce the quantity <strong>of</strong> packaging and / or waste generated.<br />

The illegitimate disposal routes are discussed in Section 9.11.<br />

9.6 Implementation Costs<br />

For the local competent authorities the shift to a pay-per-volume system has a –<br />

sometimes considerable – cost saving effect. For example after changing to the payper-volume<br />

system, the county Gießen has saved costs estimated at €1.3 million per<br />

year. The investment costs required for a district or county to change to this waste<br />

charge system are effectively more than balanced by the reduction in the quantities<br />

<strong>of</strong> residual waste, and constraint on total waste. 198<br />

The levels <strong>of</strong> the fees (and the corresponding cost savings) differ from county to<br />

county. 199 The differences result from varying utilisation <strong>of</strong> waste disposal facility<br />

capacities as well as the population in the local municipal authorities.<br />

In the Schweinfurt scheme, although collections are only <strong>of</strong>fered fortnightly, for<br />

several bin types the set out rate is close to 50% (i.e. for many householders bins are<br />

being set out approximately once a month). Interestingly, the set out rate tends to be<br />

lower for those using smaller bins. For those using larger bins, the materials tend to<br />

be collected approximately once every three weeks. This change in set out rates has<br />

led to reduced staffing levels. The materials are collected on vehicles, and the prescheme<br />

situation, in which vehicles were operated with a driver plus one crew, has<br />

changed such that they now operate as driver only side-loading vehicles.<br />

9.7 Effects on Technical Change / Innovation<br />

The policy stimulates sophisticated collection and recycling systems for multi material<br />

waste fractions. This needs to include provision for centralised food waste<br />

composting or anaerobic digestion. Furthermore, new technologies are brought onto<br />

198 See www.uni-giessen.de/ilr/gaeth/projekte/pro_gebuehrensystem/pro_gebuehrensystem.html; the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> the flexible pay per volume system in the county Gießen was scientifically attended by a<br />

university project at the University Gießen.<br />

199 EUWID from 23.08.2005, p. 11.<br />

170<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!