14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11.8 Response from Public and Industry<br />

There is probably a low level <strong>of</strong> awareness, on the part <strong>of</strong> the public, regarding the<br />

levy. As the landfill levy is not a direct charge, but rather is subsumed in waste<br />

collection charges, the public in general would probably not be aware <strong>of</strong> its existence.<br />

While the landfill levy is stated on invoices, for businesses that produce little waste,<br />

the landfill levy is minimal. For an <strong>of</strong>fice, the average landfill levy on an invoice may<br />

be an integer number <strong>of</strong> euros per month.<br />

It seems that the landfill levy is very much obscured from view as it remains<br />

(currently) a small part in the total costs <strong>of</strong> landfilling (refer to Table 11-3 above).<br />

Furthermore, the link between charging households and the landfill levy is not a direct<br />

one, even where collectors make use <strong>of</strong> weight-based charging. For example, Indecon<br />

report that in Cork, weight-based charges were as high as €0.46 per kg <strong>of</strong> residual<br />

waste. 216 In some other cases where weight-based charges are in place, the link<br />

between charge rates and landfill gate fees appears somewhat more closely aligned,<br />

though this should not be taken as evidence <strong>of</strong> a firm link between the two.<br />

As detailed in the section above, the landfill levy revenues are directed into the<br />

Environmental Fund, which is made available to support local authority run projects in<br />

waste management. This arrangement has been highlighted by private sector<br />

operators as unfair, since in the Irish market, the private sector competes with local<br />

authorities. Therefore the Environmental Fund potentially becomes a source <strong>of</strong><br />

competitive advantage for local authorities.<br />

11.9 Effects on Technical Change / Innovation<br />

As far as municipal waste is concerned, the levy has probably had very limited impact<br />

on technical change and innovation. Weighbridges at landfill sites were required in<br />

order to manage the landfill levy but by 2002 most landfill sites had already installed<br />

weighbridges as a requirement <strong>of</strong> waste licences granted by the EPA. The<br />

Environmental Fund might have achieved more in this regard.<br />

11.10 Social and Distributional Consequences<br />

The landfill levy is paid by the contractor delivering waste to the landfill. Costs are<br />

ultimately passed on directly to those producing the waste. In the case where pay by<br />

weight collection systems are in place, costs can be transmitted more directly.<br />

The low level <strong>of</strong> the levy almost certainly implies that whilst the levy might have the<br />

potential to be regressive, social and distributional consequences are likely to be<br />

minimal.<br />

216 Indecon <strong>International</strong> in association with the Institute <strong>of</strong> Local Government Studies at University <strong>of</strong><br />

Birmingham (2006) Indecon <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> Local Government Financing, Report Commissioned by the<br />

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government.<br />

195<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!