14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

aggregate (and the fact that the tax accounts for only a small proportion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

primary aggregates price). 793<br />

Sweden<br />

Sweden has a low recycling rate but this can be explained through reference to the<br />

fact that there is very little demolition taking place, and therefore, less material to<br />

recycle. The main material used for recycling is mining waste. The proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

aggregate production from secondary material is 11%. 794 Sweden has seen a shift<br />

away from the use <strong>of</strong> gravel, but given the range <strong>of</strong> policies that have been<br />

implemented, it seems unlikely that the relatively small tax on aggregates could be<br />

the main reason for the shift. Sweden does have a substantial tax on waste disposal<br />

by landfill, currently at €47/tonne, which is likely to be influential. A far more detailed<br />

analysis than is available would be required to estimate the proportion <strong>of</strong> the change<br />

accounted for specifically by the tax on aggregates, compared to the tax on waste<br />

disposal.<br />

UK<br />

The UK has the highest recycling rate for aggregate materials in Europe. They account<br />

for 25% <strong>of</strong> the UK aggregates market (the largest market share for recycled<br />

aggregates in Europe). 795 The situation here is similar to that <strong>of</strong> Sweden where<br />

unpicking the direct impact <strong>of</strong> implementing the tax on aggregate is very difficult<br />

when waste disposal is also taxed, albeit at a lower rate for construction and<br />

demolition wastes than for non-inert fractions.<br />

Evidence suggests, although cannot be conclusive, that the tax on aggregates is<br />

generally a weak policy which strongly relies on the accompanying presence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

disposal tax as an incentive to recycle. Soderholm (2001) cites Ecotec (2001) who<br />

find that disposal taxes generally provide a much stronger economic incentive than<br />

the tax on aggregates. Recycling would therefore be an expected consequence <strong>of</strong><br />

wanting to avoid disposal costs (evidence from Denmark exemplifies this point). In<br />

other words, the shift in the market is likely to be more supply driven than demand<br />

driven, but demand can be strengthened through use <strong>of</strong> standards and other<br />

demand-side measures, and this may become more necessary as supply increases.<br />

Figure 46-1 shows the percentage <strong>of</strong> the market accounted for by recycled aggregate<br />

over time, during the introduction <strong>of</strong> both the landfill tax and the tax on aggregates in<br />

the UK.<br />

793 ECOTEC Research and Consulting (2001) Economic and Environmental Implications <strong>of</strong> the Use <strong>of</strong><br />

Environmental Taxes and Charges in the EU and its Member States, Accessed 21 st October 2008,<br />

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/taxation/pdf/ch11_aggregated_taxes.pdf<br />

794 D. Legg (2007) Presentation: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Aggregate Taxes, European Environment Agency.<br />

795 European Environment Agency (2008) Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Environmental Taxes and Charges for<br />

Managing Sand, Gravel and Rock Extraction in Selected EU Countries, Accessed 23 rd October 2008,<br />

http://reports.eea.europa.eu/eea_report_2008_2/en/Effectiveness_<strong>of</strong>_environmental_taxes_final_lo<br />

w.pdf<br />

658<br />

29/09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!