14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>of</strong> a thermal efficiency <strong>of</strong> 84% and an electrical efficiency <strong>of</strong> 35%. These are<br />

optimistic in the context <strong>of</strong> efficiencies currently achieved and are likely to be<br />

deliverable only at large operating scales. The Draft BREF note gave no case where<br />

the net export <strong>of</strong> electricity exceeded 18%. 1240 A survey <strong>of</strong> 25 incinerators across<br />

Europe generating electricity only reported a maximum gross energy efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

27.9% with a weighted mean efficiency <strong>of</strong> 21.8% across the 25 facilities (the mean<br />

net efficiency was given as 17.7%). 1241 The current analysis uses a gross efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

27%, reflecting the top end <strong>of</strong> the range quoted by ERM and the CEWEP survey.<br />

N2O emissions are modelled based on previous research undertaken by Eunomia on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> WRAP. 1242 The considerable uncertainty with respect to these emissions is<br />

acknowledged within the EU BREF note, which provided a range <strong>of</strong> 5.5 – 66 g N2O per<br />

tonne <strong>of</strong> waste treated by the facility. We use the mid point <strong>of</strong> these values within the<br />

current analysis. CH4 emissions are negligible from incineration facilities.<br />

The efficiency with which metals are recovered from incineration facilities is modelled<br />

based on a survey <strong>of</strong> Dutch facilities. 1243<br />

Table 63-11 summarises the assumptions for incineration discussed previously.<br />

Table 63-11: Assumptions for Incineration<br />

Parameter Parameter Parameter<br />

Assumption<br />

Assumption<br />

Gross electrical generation efficiency 27%<br />

Electricity demand for flue gas cleaning 78 kWh / t input<br />

Diesel use by process 4.7 l / t input<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> natural gas by process 7.2 m 3 / t input<br />

Recycling <strong>of</strong> bottom ash 50%<br />

CH4 emissions from process 0 kg CH4 / t<br />

N2O emissions from process 0.04 kg N2O / t<br />

Recovery rate for ferrous metals 70%<br />

Recovery rate for non-ferrous metals 30%<br />

1240 European Commission (2005) Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, Draft Reference<br />

Document on the Best Available Techniques for <strong>Waste</strong> Incineration, Final Draft, May 2005.<br />

1241 I. Riemann (2006) CEWEP Energy Report (Status 2001-2004): Results <strong>of</strong> Specific Data for Energy,<br />

Efficiency Rates and Coefficients, Plant Efficiency Factors and NCV <strong>of</strong> 97 European W-t-E Plants and<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> the Main Energy Results, updated July 2006.<br />

1242 Eunomia (2007) Emissions <strong>of</strong> Nitrous Oxide from <strong>Waste</strong> Treatment Processes, Report to WRAP,<br />

July 2007.<br />

1243 L. Muchova and P. Rem (2008) Wet or Dry Separation: <strong>Management</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bottom Ash in Europe,<br />

<strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> World Magazine, 9(3).<br />

1001<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!