14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28.10 Effect <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Policy</strong> on Pricing <strong>of</strong> Resources / Services<br />

Where the packaging tax has been implemented in co-ordination with a life cycle<br />

analysis, resources are valued in relation to the damage they impact upon the<br />

environment. In principle, this should be a positive development and is aligned with<br />

standard economic theory in terms <strong>of</strong> improving the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the functioning <strong>of</strong><br />

markets. Arguably, the Danish approach is more ‘correct’, since it does not confine<br />

itself to climate change-based externalities only.<br />

Even so, this pricing has drawn criticism by some groups (e.g. Beverage Can Makers<br />

Europe) as the life cycle analysis is seen as having the ability to ‘distort’ decisionmaking.<br />

Industry does, however, have a habit <strong>of</strong> criticising instruments which seek to<br />

bring about change in materials use on the basis <strong>of</strong> their being ‘distorting’ even where<br />

they set out earnestly to reflect – however imperfectly – the externalities associated<br />

with material use. The system has also been criticised in Denmark, where there is no<br />

distinction between recycled aluminium and virgin product. 605 This would seem to<br />

ignore the benefits <strong>of</strong> recycling aluminium in this tax system.<br />

In the Netherlands, the relative tax rates seek to account for the way in which a given<br />

material is managed in the country’s waste management system. This itself presents<br />

problems since, in principle, as the management routes change, so the relative tax<br />

rates ought to change too. If, on the other hand, the measure is not intended to<br />

change these management routes, then arguably, it loses its potency as an<br />

instrument, although it still raises revenue.<br />

This brief discussion highlights two points:<br />

506<br />

29/09/09<br />

a) the intention <strong>of</strong> packaging taxes is to “distort” decision making, if by this,<br />

one understands the intention to change decisions on packaging<br />

b) a critical issue is the boundaries for the analysis and how the tax rates are<br />

met. Clearly, applying uniform rates for virgin and recycled materials does<br />

not reflect the environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> the packaging<br />

28.11 Evasion and Enforcement<br />

In Denmark the packaging tax has created some issues for importers <strong>of</strong> packaged<br />

products in that they need to know the packaging material and packaging weight <strong>of</strong><br />

all the goods which they import. Some importers have found it difficult to obtain<br />

accurate information from their suppliers and have struggled to comply with the<br />

regulations. The de minimis level applied in the Dutch tax should make enforcement<br />

relatively more straightforward since this reduces the number who are targeted by the<br />

policy.<br />

605 ECOTEC in association with CESAM, C. U. (2001) Study on Environmental Taxes and Charges in the<br />

European Union and its Member States, Final report for the European Commission, April 2001.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!