14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

63.0 Externalities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Options<br />

The following residual treatments are considered within our analysis:<br />

978<br />

1. Landfill <strong>of</strong> untreated material;<br />

2. Incineration (generation <strong>of</strong> electricity only);<br />

3. Two MBT treatment processes:<br />

29/09/09<br />

a. Aerobic Stabilisation (with pre-treated output sent to landfill);<br />

b. Aerobic Biodrying producing SRF sent to incineration (generating<br />

electricity only) with rejected material stabilised prior to being sent to<br />

landfill.<br />

We have considered emissions <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gases and the impacts upon air quality<br />

that are expected to result from the treatment process, including both direct and<br />

indirect impacts (the latter relating to avoided impacts associated with energy<br />

generation and the recycling <strong>of</strong> materials).<br />

Our approach is to apply external damage costs to emissions <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gases<br />

and a range <strong>of</strong> air pollutants, allowing for the quantification <strong>of</strong> impacts in monetary<br />

terms.<br />

As highlighted in Annex 61.0, this type <strong>of</strong> analysis is complex and is affected by a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> variables and parameters. The analysis that follows is focussed upon<br />

emissions to air. Whilst waste treatment processes may also in some cases affect soil<br />

and water quality, data regarding the precise nature <strong>of</strong> these impacts is less than<br />

robust. Similarly, we have not included damage costs associated with disamenity <strong>of</strong><br />

waste treatment facilities, as estimates <strong>of</strong> disamenity costs vary considerably<br />

between the different sources, and no studies are available <strong>of</strong> this nature on MBT<br />

treatment processes, whilst few are available for landfill and incineration. This<br />

omission is likely to be the more significant <strong>of</strong> the omissions if one takes the view that<br />

well-regulated processes are unlikely to have significant effects <strong>of</strong> water and soils.<br />

This section outlines the approach taken within our analysis. Section 63.1 discusses<br />

the generic assumptions which apply to each <strong>of</strong> the treatment technologies under<br />

consideration. These include assumptions relating to energy generation, and the<br />

external damage costs applied to each <strong>of</strong> the air pollutants. This is followed by<br />

sections on each <strong>of</strong> the residual waste treatment technologies in turn. A summary <strong>of</strong><br />

the results – presented in terms <strong>of</strong> the external damage costs attributed to each <strong>of</strong><br />

the treatment technologies - is provided in Section 63.6.<br />

63.1 Generic Assumptions for Treatment Technologies<br />

This section describes the underlying assumptions common to all treatment<br />

technologies under consideration within the current analysis.<br />

63.1.1 External Costs<br />

Our approach has been as follows:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!