14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

686<br />

29/09/09<br />

Singapore’s use <strong>of</strong> prefabricated concrete slabs. 836 There are many examples<br />

<strong>of</strong> voluntary codes <strong>of</strong> practice which encourage sustainable construction and<br />

demolition which have not been included in this review as they are not<br />

considered a policy. For example, the Code <strong>of</strong> Practice on Buildable Design in<br />

Singapore and the Code for Sustainable Homes in Scotland, England and<br />

Wales. However, it is possible that in the future these may be mandated, as<br />

has been the trend for other initiatives or schemes which are now considered<br />

to be policies.<br />

48.8 Social and Distributional Consequences<br />

Social and distributional consequences would only be expected where:<br />

� either, the policy differentiated between companies; or<br />

� the costs introduced by the policy had a significant impact on the price <strong>of</strong><br />

construction projects targeted by the policy.<br />

In reality, the policies seem either to impose minimal costs (companies may even<br />

reduce waste management costs, depending upon the other policies in place).<br />

In cases where refunded compliance bonds are in place, the bond is typically related<br />

to the size <strong>of</strong> the project. The bond itself can be refunded on achievement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

required target. In principle, those with more pressing cash-flow problems would find<br />

it more difficult to put up the compliance bond in advance.<br />

Clearly, a beneficiary should be the reprocessing sector, in particular, accredited<br />

facilities.<br />

48.9 Complementary Policies<br />

Unlike the minimum recycling standards for household and C&I waste materials, the<br />

recycling standards <strong>of</strong> waste streams in C&D are not underpinned by financial<br />

support policies such as producer responsibility and pay-by-use. However, examples<br />

<strong>of</strong> refunded compliance bonds have been seen in the USA which provide a financial<br />

incentive to reach the set recycling targets. Also, in Austria there is a reduction in<br />

waste management fees for separately collected demolition waste. 837<br />

An alternative policy to mandatory recycling is to mandate the use <strong>of</strong> recycled<br />

products, thereby forcing recycling rates up to ensure the recycled material is<br />

available. Due to the close association between the two policy mechanisms it is<br />

possible that both could be simultaneously implemented in one policy. It has been<br />

common in the past for such guidelines to be included in green public procurement<br />

836 AEA Technology (2007) <strong>International</strong> Approaches to <strong>Waste</strong> Prevention and Minimisation, Final<br />

Report for Defra (BREW), Accessed 15 th October 2008,<br />

http://www.crwplatform.co.uk/conwaste/assets/Publications/2006-7-Reports/<strong>International</strong>-<br />

Approaches-to-<strong>Waste</strong>-Prevention-and-Minimisation.pdf<br />

837 European Topic Centre on Resource and <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> [Online],<br />

http://waste.eionet.europa.eu/facts/factsheets_waste/Instruments [Accessed 8th September 2008].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!