14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

procedure. It would be considerably more difficult to manage several different waste<br />

collectors though their individual permits.<br />

15.11 Evasion and Enforcement<br />

MBOs are signed with representative industry associations which do not always cover<br />

the full 100% <strong>of</strong> the market. Industry bodies are established but companies are free<br />

to join these bodies or to fulfil their EPR-obligations on their own. In practice, a certain<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> producers neither join the EPR bodies nor fulfil EPR obligations on their<br />

own. They are called ‘free-riders’ because they pr<strong>of</strong>it from the advantages <strong>of</strong> the MBO<br />

(e.g. they are not subject to extra legislation) while they do not contribute to the<br />

efforts <strong>of</strong> the MBO. In the Environmental <strong>Policy</strong> Agreements, eliminating free-riders is<br />

explicitly included as an important responsibility for the signing authority.<br />

A specific service within OVAM, containing 15 employees, has been established with<br />

the explicit task to enforce the EPR and to identify free-riders. Within the IVCIE, five<br />

employees are involved in enforcement on packaging waste free-riders.<br />

Households are also obliged to use the correct collection channels for obligated<br />

materials. Figure 15-7shows an example <strong>of</strong> measures taken to enforce compliance.<br />

Figure 15-7: Sticker Used by FOST Plus to Warn the Householder <strong>of</strong> Wrong Content<br />

15.12 Lessons Learned<br />

EPR mechanisms do not always lead to better environmental design, but are very<br />

effective in enhancing the amount <strong>of</strong> waste collected for recycling.<br />

When EPR-targets are imposed in a rather large industry group, e.g. the producers <strong>of</strong><br />

packaging waste, the incentive for individual companies to change their packaging<br />

strategy can become watered down. When easy to recycle packaging is collected in<br />

sufficient amounts, the recycling targets <strong>of</strong> the sector can be reached and the<br />

producers <strong>of</strong> difficult to recycle packaging can pr<strong>of</strong>it from the results <strong>of</strong> the sector as<br />

a whole without being incentivised to develop more recyclable packaging waste<br />

themselves. In Belgium, companies contributing to FOST-Plus (the industry body for<br />

household packaging waste) receive a green dot label. But the FOST-Plus collection<br />

scheme for packaging is selective in the kind <strong>of</strong> packaging waste that is collected.<br />

Difficult or expensive to recycle waste, such as butter packaging, is excluded from the<br />

295<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: Annexes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!