14.12.2012 Views

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

International Review of Waste Management Policy - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The German deposit scheme is recognized as an expensive scheme. Perchards<br />

note: 366<br />

330<br />

29/09/09<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the small importers in our survey reported that DPG participation was<br />

very expensive, far more than participation in DSD. These costs had a knockon<br />

effect on the retail price <strong>of</strong> the drink.<br />

Some also reported administrative problems, such as that DPG was slow to<br />

refund deposit monies and that it had changed its terms and conditions three<br />

times last year. Some other importers indicated similar problems, but put<br />

these down to ‘teething troubles’, and said that things were now operating<br />

more smoothly.<br />

Some importers told us that their customers are expressing a preference for<br />

refillables, and so these importers are now considering switching to refillables.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> these issues may relate specifically to the way DPG operates, but<br />

much <strong>of</strong> the expense is inherent in any clearing system for deposits, and<br />

these costs inevitably bear more heavily on low-volume operators.<br />

Imported speciality products have to compete in a highly price-sensitive<br />

market in which the deposit on non-refillables might be twice the basic price<br />

<strong>of</strong> the product. For example, in REWE, which is not classified as a discounter,<br />

we bought a bottle <strong>of</strong> mineral water for € 0.12 (plus €0.25 deposit). In a REAL<br />

hypermarket and in the discounter Penny, we bought beer for € 0.29 (plus<br />

€0.25 deposit). Cans <strong>of</strong> Faxe beer imported from Denmark cost €0.55 (plus<br />

€0.25 deposit) at the traditional supermarket Edeka.<br />

Where imported speciality beers were on sale, which was predominantly in<br />

department store food halls, we found that the bottles were <strong>of</strong>ten sold as<br />

refillables. During our telephone survey <strong>of</strong> importers, we were told that<br />

participation in DPG is simply too expensive for the small quantities <strong>of</strong> each<br />

beer imported by each company. To recover the cost <strong>of</strong> registration, the retail<br />

price <strong>of</strong> the beer would have to increase by around €0.30 per bottle, which is<br />

more than the total price excluding deposit <strong>of</strong> standard German beers. One<br />

importer told us that it had lost around half its customers since the deposit<br />

was first imposed. Marking the bottles as refillable and charging only an<br />

€0.08 deposit reduces the perceived price by €0.17. Even so, we paid € 1.99<br />

for a bottle <strong>of</strong> Spendrups beer from Sweden (which no deposit was charged<br />

on, for some reason) and € 2.49 for Asahi and Quilmes, from Karstadt<br />

department stores.<br />

In a more recent report, Perchards add, regarding the German system: 367<br />

DPG, the system operators, commented in May 2008 that the cost per<br />

container is three times as much as household-based collection.<br />

366 Perchards (2007) Study on Factual Implementation <strong>of</strong> a Nationwide Take-back System in Germany<br />

After 1 May 2006, Final Report, 14 February 2007.<br />

367 G. Bevington (2008) A Deposit and Refund Scheme in Ireland, Report commissioned by Repak Ltd.,<br />

September 2008.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!